linux-kernel - Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH v2] Staging: greybus: camera: cleanup multiple checks for null pointers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14aa0ddb-8600-a0af-5d42-ed5be55c27f1@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:44:46 -0600
From:   Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To:     Sumit Pundir <pundirsumit11@...il.com>, johan@...nel.org
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, elder@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH v2] Staging: greybus: camera: cleanup
 multiple checks for null pointers

On 01/08/2018 10:50 AM, Sumit Pundir wrote:
> Fixed coding style issue regarding null comparison at multiple lines.
> Issue reported by checkpatch.pl
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Pundir <pundirsumit11@...il.com>

Looks good.  The subject should say "staging" rather than "Staging" 
but that's probably not a big deal.

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>

> ---
> v2:
>  Updated the patch title and description.
> 
>  drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c
> index f13f16b..07ebfb8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c
> @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ static ssize_t gb_camera_debugfs_configure_streams(struct gb_camera *gcam,
>  
>  	/* Retrieve number of streams to configure */
>  	token = strsep(&buf, ";");
> -	if (token == NULL)
> +	if (!token)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	ret = kstrtouint(token, 10, &nstreams);
> @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static ssize_t gb_camera_debugfs_configure_streams(struct gb_camera *gcam,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	token = strsep(&buf, ";");
> -	if (token == NULL)
> +	if (!token)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	ret = kstrtouint(token, 10, &flags);
> @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ static ssize_t gb_camera_debugfs_configure_streams(struct gb_camera *gcam,
>  
>  		/* width */
>  		token = strsep(&buf, ";");
> -		if (token == NULL) {
> +		if (!token) {
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			goto done;
>  		}
> @@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ static ssize_t gb_camera_debugfs_configure_streams(struct gb_camera *gcam,
>  
>  		/* height */
>  		token = strsep(&buf, ";");
> -		if (token == NULL)
> +		if (!token)
>  			goto done;
>  
>  		ret = kstrtouint(token, 10, &stream->height);
> @@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ static ssize_t gb_camera_debugfs_configure_streams(struct gb_camera *gcam,
>  
>  		/* Image format code */
>  		token = strsep(&buf, ";");
> -		if (token == NULL)
> +		if (!token)
>  			goto done;
>  
>  		ret = kstrtouint(token, 16, &stream->format);
> @@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ static ssize_t gb_camera_debugfs_capture(struct gb_camera *gcam,
>  
>  	/* Request id */
>  	token = strsep(&buf, ";");
> -	if (token == NULL)
> +	if (!token)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	ret = kstrtouint(token, 10, &request_id);
>  	if (ret < 0)
> @@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ static ssize_t gb_camera_debugfs_capture(struct gb_camera *gcam,
>  
>  	/* Stream mask */
>  	token = strsep(&buf, ";");
> -	if (token == NULL)
> +	if (!token)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	ret = kstrtouint(token, 16, &streams_mask);
>  	if (ret < 0)
> @@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ static ssize_t gb_camera_debugfs_capture(struct gb_camera *gcam,
>  
>  	/* number of frames */
>  	token = strsep(&buf, ";");
> -	if (token == NULL)
> +	if (!token)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	ret = kstrtouint(token, 10, &num_frames);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>