linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: x86: add SPEC_CTRL and IBPB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5A53C1DA.50901@ORACLE.COM>
Date:   Mon, 08 Jan 2018 21:09:14 +0200
From:   Liran Alon <LIRAN.ALON@...CLE.COM>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
CC:     jmattson@...gle.com, aliguori@...zon.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
        dwmw@...zon.co.uk, bp@...en8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: x86: add SPEC_CTRL and IBPB_SUPPORT accessors



On 08/01/18 20:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> As an interim measure until SPEC_CTRL is supported by upstream
> Linux in cpufeatures, add a function that lets vmx.c and svm.c
> know whether to save/restore MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c |  3 ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index 8e9a07c557f1..767af697c20c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -67,9 +67,6 @@ u64 kvm_supported_xcr0(void)
>
>   #define F(x) bit(X86_FEATURE_##x)
>
> -/* These are scattered features in cpufeatures.h. */
> -#define KVM_CPUID_BIT_AVX512_4VNNIW     2
> -#define KVM_CPUID_BIT_AVX512_4FMAPS     3
>   #define KF(x) bit(KVM_CPUID_BIT_##x)
>
>   int kvm_update_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> index c2cea6651279..8d04ccf177ce 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> @@ -155,6 +155,28 @@ static inline int guest_cpuid_stepping(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	return x86_stepping(best->eax);
>   }
>
> +/* These are scattered features in cpufeatures.h. */
> +#define KVM_CPUID_BIT_AVX512_4VNNIW	2
> +#define KVM_CPUID_BIT_AVX512_4FMAPS	3
> +#define KVM_CPUID_BIT_SPEC_CTRL		26
> +#define KVM_CPUID_BIT_STIBP		27
> +
> +/* CPUID[eax=0x80000008].ebx */
> +#define KVM_CPUID_BIT_IBPB_SUPPORT	12
> +
> +static inline bool cpu_has_spec_ctrl(void)
> +{
> +	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> +	cpuid_count(7, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> +
> +	return edx & bit(KVM_CPUID_BIT_SPEC_CTRL);

Why not just "return cpuid_edx(7) & bit(KVM_CPUID_BIT_SPEC_CTRL);"?
This is also consistent with how cpu_has_ibpb_support() is written.

> +}
> +
> +static inline bool cpu_has_ibpb_support(void)
> +{
> +	return cpuid_ebx(0x80000008) & bit(KVM_CPUID_BIT_IBPB_SUPPORT);
> +}
> +
>   static inline bool supports_cpuid_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   {
>   	return vcpu->arch.msr_platform_info & MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT;
>