[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180108.143256.2300624650207352851.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 14:32:56 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: laoar.shao@...il.com
Cc: songliubraving@...com, brendan.d.gregg@...il.com,
marcelo.leitner@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: tracepoint: exposing sk_faimily in
tracepoint inet_sock_set_state
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 14:31:47 +0800
> As of now, there're two sk_family are traced with sock:inet_sock_set_state,
> which are AF_INET and AF_INET6.
> So the sk_family are exposed as well.
> Then we can conveniently use it to do the filter.
>
> Both sk_family and sk_protocol are showed in the printk message, so we need
> not expose them as tracepoint arguments.
>
> Suggested-by: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>
> Suggested-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Applied, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists