[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180109214602.k7cuxwikg6xshztu@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 22:46:02 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] x86/arch_prctl: add ARCH_GET_NOPTI and
ARCH_SET_NOPTI to enable/disable PTI
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:32:27PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Requiring a reboot just to fix a performance problem you've discovered
> the hard way is not the most friendly way to help users I'm afraid.
That's a very strange argument: if you know you'd need max perf, you
boot with pti=allow_optout.
Color me confused.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists