linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] x86/arch_prctl: add ARCH_GET_NOPTI and ARCH_SET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Jan 2018 15:53:54 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] x86/arch_prctl: add ARCH_GET_NOPTI and ARCH_SET_NOPTI to enable/disable PTI



> On Jan 9, 2018, at 2:06 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:46:02PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:32:27PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>> Requiring a reboot just to fix a performance problem you've discovered
>>> the hard way is not the most friendly way to help users I'm afraid.
>> 
>> That's a very strange argument: if you know you'd need max perf, you
>> boot with pti=allow_optout.
>> 
>> Color me confused.
> 
> That's very simple : you first know you need more perf when you see the
> name of your boss on your phone asking what's happening with the site
> suddenly crawling at the worst possible moment, when everyone is there
> to see it dead. Performance is something that's tuned at runtime, always,
> not via random reboots. When you have 10 servers running at 100% CPU,
> the last thing you're thinking about is to remove one of them so that
> the 9 remaining ones are at 110% while you reboot :-/

Here's another idea: make it a module
  To enable it, you do modprobe pti_control allow_privileged_prctl=1.