linux-kernel - Re: [11/12] watchdog: sp5100-tco: Abort if watchdog is disabled by hardware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b56f6ba-bf76-a500-087a-49f34cd4b5d5@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:58:00 +0100
From:   Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...il.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc:     Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zoltán Böszörményi <zboszor@...hu>
Subject: Re: [11/12] watchdog: sp5100-tco: Abort if watchdog is disabled by
 hardware

On 10.01.2018 00:37, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 05:58:07PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
>> Hi! I'm the one from the Fedora bugzilla who said they'd help review these
>> patches. I might end up responding to this with a real review comment after
>> this message, but first:
>>
>> mind cc'ing me future versions of this patchset and also, is there any way you
> 
> Sure.
> 
>> know of that one could figure out whether or not the sp5100_tco wdt is
>> actually disabled by the OEM on a board? I tried testing these patches with my
> 
> That is what the code is trying to do today.
> 
>> system and it appears to be convinced that it's disabled on my system, but I'm
>> hoping something in this patch is just broken…
>>
> 
> I tested the driver on three different boards. MSI B350M MORTAR,
> MSI B350 TOMAHAWK, and Gigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3. CPU is Ryzen 1700X
> on all boards.
> 
> On the MSI boards, the watchdog is reported as disabled. Enabling it
> and letting it expire does not have an effect. I am using the Super-IO
> watchdog instead on those boards (and it works).
> 
> On the Gigabyte board, the watchdog is reported as enabled, and it works
> (and the watchdog on the Super-IO chips does not work).
> 
> Feel free to play with the driver. Maybe there is a means to enable the
> watchdog if it is disabled. Unfortunately, I was unable to figure out how
> to do it, so I thought it is better to report the fact and not instantiate
> the watchdog if it doesn't work.
> 

I haven an Supemricro H11DSi-NT with EPYCs CPUs..
I can set the watchdog ON/OFF in BIOS and also set in to reset or NMI
with the moatherboard jumpers.

If you want I can give whatever patches for this driver an try ,
just let me know.

Regards,

Gabriel C