[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180109035207.GD3668920@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 19:52:07 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Can RCU stall lead to hard lockups?
Hello, Paul.
So, I was looking at a machine which triggered crashdump from NMI hard
lockup. The dmesg was filled up with backtraces - many were stuck in
reclaim path, which seems to be the culprit, the others were stuck in
RCU path. It looks like by the time crashdump was created, all CPUs
got stuck in RCU path.
One of the CPUs looked like the following.
PID: 4149739 TASK: ffff881a46baa880 CPU: 13 COMMAND: "CPUThreadPool8"
#0 [ffff881fff945e48] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffff8103f7d0
#1 [ffff881fff945e58] nmi_handle at ffffffff81020653
#2 [ffff881fff945eb0] default_do_nmi at ffffffff81020c36
#3 [ffff881fff945ed0] do_nmi at ffffffff81020d32
#4 [ffff881fff945ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff81956a7e
[exception RIP: io_serial_in+21]
RIP: ffffffff81630e55 RSP: ffff881fff943b88 RFLAGS: 00000002
RAX: 000000000000ca00 RBX: ffffffff8230e188 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 00000000000002fd RSI: 0000000000000005 RDI: ffffffff8230e188
RBP: ffff881fff943bb0 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: ffffffff820cb3c4
R10: 0000000000000019 R11: 0000000000002000 R12: 00000000000026e1
R13: 0000000000000020 R14: ffffffff820cd398 R15: 0000000000000035
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0000
--- <NMI exception stack> ---
#5 [ffff881fff943b88] io_serial_in at ffffffff81630e55
#6 [ffff881fff943b90] wait_for_xmitr at ffffffff8163175c
#7 [ffff881fff943bb8] serial8250_console_putchar at ffffffff816317dc
#8 [ffff881fff943bd8] uart_console_write at ffffffff8162ac00
#9 [ffff881fff943c08] serial8250_console_write at ffffffff81634691
#10 [ffff881fff943c80] univ8250_console_write at ffffffff8162f7c2
#11 [ffff881fff943c90] console_unlock at ffffffff810dfc55
#12 [ffff881fff943cf0] vprintk_emit at ffffffff810dffb5
#13 [ffff881fff943d50] vprintk_default at ffffffff810e01bf
#14 [ffff881fff943d60] vprintk_func at ffffffff810e1127
#15 [ffff881fff943d70] printk at ffffffff8119a8a4
#16 [ffff881fff943dd0] print_cpu_stall_info at ffffffff810eb78c
#17 [ffff881fff943e88] rcu_check_callbacks at ffffffff810ef133
#18 [ffff881fff943ee8] update_process_times at ffffffff810f3497
#19 [ffff881fff943f10] tick_sched_timer at ffffffff81103037
#20 [ffff881fff943f38] __hrtimer_run_queues at ffffffff810f3f38
#21 [ffff881fff943f88] hrtimer_interrupt at ffffffff810f442b
The CPU which triggered hardlockup:
PID: 4149709 TASK: ffff88010f88c380 CPU: 26 COMMAND: "CPUThreadPool35"
#0 [ffff883fff1059d0] machine_kexec at ffffffff8104a874
#1 [ffff883fff105a30] __crash_kexec at ffffffff811116cc
#2 [ffff883fff105af0] __crash_kexec at ffffffff81111795
#3 [ffff883fff105b08] panic at ffffffff8119a6ae
#4 [ffff883fff105b98] watchdog_overflow_callback at ffffffff81135dbd
#5 [ffff883fff105bb0] __perf_event_overflow at ffffffff81186866
#6 [ffff883fff105be8] perf_event_overflow at ffffffff81192bc4
#7 [ffff883fff105bf8] intel_pmu_handle_irq at ffffffff8100b265
#8 [ffff883fff105df8] perf_event_nmi_handler at ffffffff8100489f
#9 [ffff883fff105e58] nmi_handle at ffffffff81020653
#10 [ffff883fff105eb0] default_do_nmi at ffffffff81020b94
#11 [ffff883fff105ed0] do_nmi at ffffffff81020d32
#12 [ffff883fff105ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff81956a7e
[exception RIP: queued_spin_lock_slowpath+248]
RIP: ffffffff810da958 RSP: ffff883fff103e68 RFLAGS: 00000046
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000046 RCX: 00000000006d0000
RDX: ffff883fff49a950 RSI: 0000000000d10101 RDI: ffffffff81e54300
RBP: ffff883fff103e80 R8: ffff883fff11a950 R9: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000000e5873ba R11: 000000000000010f R12: ffffffff81e54300
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88010f88c380 R15: ffffffff81e54300
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
--- <NMI exception stack> ---
#13 [ffff883fff103e68] queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff810da958
#14 [ffff883fff103e70] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff8195550b
#15 [ffff883fff103e88] rcu_check_callbacks at ffffffff810eed18
#16 [ffff883fff103ee8] update_process_times at ffffffff810f3497
#17 [ffff883fff103f10] tick_sched_timer at ffffffff81103037
#18 [ffff883fff103f38] __hrtimer_run_queues at ffffffff810f3f38
#19 [ffff883fff103f88] hrtimer_interrupt at ffffffff810f442b
--- <IRQ stack> ---
bt: read error: kernel virtual address: ffffffffffffffd8 type: "pt_regs"
All other CPUs have something similar to the following:
PID: 4150460 TASK: ffff88162c891b00 CPU: 8 COMMAND: "GlobalIOThreadP"
#0 [ffff881fff805e48] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffff8103f7d0
#1 [ffff881fff805e58] nmi_handle at ffffffff81020653
#2 [ffff881fff805eb0] default_do_nmi at ffffffff81020c36
#3 [ffff881fff805ed0] do_nmi at ffffffff81020d32
#4 [ffff881fff805ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff81956a7e
[exception RIP: queued_spin_lock_slowpath+248]
RIP: ffffffff810da958 RSP: ffff881fff803e68 RFLAGS: 00000046
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000046 RCX: 0000000000250000
RDX: ffff881fffb1a950 RSI: 00000000002d0101 RDI: ffffffff81e54300
RBP: ffff881fff803e80 R8: ffff881fff81a950 R9: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000000e5873ba R11: ffff88207fffd000 R12: ffffffff81e54300
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88162c891b00 R15: ffffffff81e54300
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0000
--- <NMI exception stack> ---
#5 [ffff881fff803e68] queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff810da958
#6 [ffff881fff803e70] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff8195550b
#7 [ffff881fff803e88] rcu_check_callbacks at ffffffff810eed18
#8 [ffff881fff803ee8] update_process_times at ffffffff810f3497
#9 [ffff881fff803f10] tick_sched_timer at ffffffff81103037
#10 [ffff881fff803f38] __hrtimer_run_queues at ffffffff810f3f38
#11 [ffff881fff803f88] hrtimer_interrupt at ffffffff810f442b
--- <IRQ stack> ---
I don't know the RCU code at all but it *looks* like the first CPU is
taking a sweet while flushing printk buffer while holding a lock (the
console is IPMI serial console, which faithfully emulates 115200 baud
rate), and everyone else seems stuck waiting for that spinlock in
rcu_check_callbacks().
Does this sound possible?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists