[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxkBkyDOApZF9zHzLY4nDkX+mxVOZQqAxGxNP6eUikBgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 20:21:09 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] net: mpls: prevent bounds-check bypass via
speculative execution
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> # carry will be clear if idx >= max
> cmpq %idx,%max
Bah. Other way around.
cmpq %max,%idx
I'm a moron.
> # mask will be clear if carry was clear, ~0 otherwise
> sbbq %mask,%mask
>
> to generate mask directly. I might have screwed that up. Worth perhaps trying?
More importantly, worth _testing_ and fixing my hand-waving "asm like
this" crap.
But I do think that simple two-instruction cmpq/sbbq sequence could
get it right in just two trivial ALU instructions.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists