[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH7mPvj449dgjeLmWHHN9xTmM+4qXXrxM_2uQoBhcPPGgnhrSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 20:35:19 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zsmalloc: use U suffix for negative literals being shifted
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:04 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. I have missed this until now. ;-(
No worries, figured patches would need a post holiday bump for review.
>
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Nick Desaulniers
> <nick.desaulniers@...il.com> wrote:
>> - link->next = -1 << OBJ_TAG_BITS;
>> + link->next = -1U << OBJ_TAG_BITS;
>
> -1UL?
Oops, good catch.
> Please, resend it with including Andrew Morton
> <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> who merges zsmalloc patch into his tree.
Will do.
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> Oh, boy, shouldn't be rather GENMASK() / GENMASK_ULL() in a way how
Thanks for the suggestion. `GENMASK(BITS_PER_LONG - 1, OBJ_TAG_BITS);`
is equivalent. Whether that is more readable, I'll wait for Minchan
to decide. If that's preferred, I'll make sure to credit you with the
Suggested-By tag in the commit message.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists