[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180109154642.GK3668920@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 07:46:42 -0800
From: "tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
Cc: "jbacik@...com" <jbacik@...com>, "jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>,
"clm@...com" <clm@...com>, "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"kernel-team@...com" <kernel-team@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com" <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU
and generation based scheme
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 11:29:11PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Does "gstate" perhaps stand for "generation number and state"? If so, please
> mention this in one of the above comments.
Yeah, will do.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists