[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALvZod4WCsrcx+Zrj9pNSoJFyhB7_5OZxBxT_kiy0unprKMdcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:22:53 -0800
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/memcg: try harder to decrease [memory,memsw].limit_in_bytes
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
> mem_cgroup_resize_[memsw]_limit() tries to free only 32 (SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
> pages on each iteration. This makes practically impossible to decrease
> limit of memory cgroup. Tasks could easily allocate back 32 pages,
> so we can't reduce memory usage, and once retry_count reaches zero we return
> -EBUSY.
>
> Easy to reproduce the problem by running the following commands:
>
> mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test
> echo $$ >> /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/tasks
> cat big_file > /dev/null &
> sleep 1 && echo $((100*1024*1024)) > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/memory.limit_in_bytes
> -bash: echo: write error: Device or resource busy
>
> Instead of relying on retry_count, keep retrying the reclaim until
> the desired limit is reached or fail if the reclaim doesn't make
> any progress or a signal is pending.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists