[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <236e468acaef47d6847809d09a88ee06@svr-chch-ex1.atlnz.lc>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 20:08:31 +0000
From: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
CC: "jlu@...gutronix.de" <jlu@...gutronix.de>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: enable L2 cache parity and ecc on
db-xc3-24g4xg board
Hi Gregory,
On 10/01/18 21:24, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On mar., janv. 09 2018, Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
>
> Could you have add a (even small) message in the commit log?
>
> Also could you improve the title by specify that it applies on
> armada-xp, like this:
>
> ARM: dts: armada-xp: enable L2 cache parity and ecc on db-xc3-24g4xg
>
Will do.
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-db-xc3-24g4xg.dts | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-db-xc3-24g4xg.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-db-xc3-24g4xg.dts
>> index 06fce35d7491..00ca489fc788 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-db-xc3-24g4xg.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-db-xc3-24g4xg.dts
>> @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@
>> };
>> };
>>
>> +&L2 {
>> + arm,parity-enable;
>> + marvell,ecc-enable;
>
> It is not a problem for me to already applied the device tree change
> even if the driver is not merged yet. But I would like to have an
> acked-by on this new property by either a device tree maintainer or at
> least the EDAC maintainer, of course having both acked-by would be
> perfect ! :)
Thanks, I was hoping you would say that. That way I can keep this
independent of the EDAC driver changes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gregory
>
>
>
>
>> +};
>> +
>> &devbus_bootcs {
>> status = "okay";
>>
>> --
>> 2.15.1
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists