linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/alternatives: Fix optimize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180110201532.5jnji6ypfl6slzvb@treble>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:15:32 -0600
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/alternatives: Fix optimize_nops() checking

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 08:55:40PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:28 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Make sure we scan all bytes before we decide to optimize the NOPs in
> > > there.
> > 
> > Can we also add compile-time checking (presumably in objtool, but who
> > knows) that there are no relocations in the alternative section?
> 
> Cc'ing the overlor^Haded objtool wizard
> 
> > Because that was the other "oops, this really doesn't work with
> > altinstructions" issue, wasn't it?

I think .altinstruction relocations *do* work if they're for the first
instruction, and it's a jump or a call.  There's some alternatives code
which adjusts the jump/call offset in that case, and there are some
users of alternatives who rely on that.

I think Boris had a patch floating around to add an instruction decoder
to alternatives, so you can do a call/jmp anywhere.

-- 
Josh