[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180110212038.GR21040@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:20:38 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] clk: sunxi: Use CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for critical
clks
On 01/02, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> We'd like to privatize __clk_get(), but the sunxi clk driver is
> calling this function to keep a reference held on the clk and
> call clk_prepare_enable() on it. We support this design in the
> clk core now with the CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag, so let's just use
> that instead.
>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists