[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180110212844.12441-2-acme@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:28:18 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/27] perf test bpf: Improve message about expected samples
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
When failing on one of the BPF tests we were just stating:
BPF filter result incorrect
Add some more info to help figuring out the problem:
BPF filter result incorrect, expected 56, got 0 samples
This came out while investigating this failure, first seen after
updating the kernel to the 4.15.0-rc6 tag:
[root@...et ~]# perf test bpf
39: BPF filter :
39.1: Basic BPF filtering : FAILED!
39.2: BPF pinning : Skip
39.3: BPF prologue generation: Skip
39.4: BPF relocation checker : Skip
[root@...et ~]#
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-403npu7daupv6b2bmxliv5pk@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/tests/bpf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
index c433dd30975a..057c6b8fdb53 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int do_test(struct bpf_object *obj, int (*func)(void),
}
if (count != expect) {
- pr_debug("BPF filter result incorrect\n");
+ pr_debug("BPF filter result incorrect, expected %d, got %d samples\n", expect, count);
goto out_delete_evlist;
}
--
2.14.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists