[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzyVFEUKaLpqxfwh5E9QFgMjzr+wVoYGxqTHVDkGcFkOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 16:39:19 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Fix NOSPEC_JMP for tip
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
> The following patch fixes it for me. Something doesn't
> seem to work with ALTERNATIVE_2. It adds only a few bytes
> more code, so seems acceptable.
Ugh. It's kind of stupid, though.
Why is the code sequence not simply:
ALTERNATIVE "", "lfence", X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE_AMD
ALTERNATIVE __stringify(jmp *\reg), __stringify(RETPOLINE_JMP \reg),
X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE
ie make that X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE_AMD _only_ emit the "lfence", and
simply fall through to what will be the "jmp *\reg" of the
non-RETPOLINE version.
Then just make sure X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE_AMD disables X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE.
That is both simpler an dsmaller, no?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists