[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1515570550-4497-1-git-send-email-daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:49:10 +0900
From: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@...sung.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] f2fs: handle newly created page when revoking inmem
pages
When committing inmem pages is successful, we revoke already committed
blocks in __revoke_inmem_pages() and finally replace the committed
ones with the old blocks using f2fs_replace_block(). However, if
the committed block was newly created one, the address of the old
block is NEW_ADDR and __f2fs_replace_block() cannot handle NEW_ADDR
as new_blkaddr properly and a kernel panic occurrs.
Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@...sung.com>
Tested-by: Shu Tan <shu.tan@...sung.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index c117e09..0673d08 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -248,7 +248,11 @@ static int __revoke_inmem_pages(struct inode *inode,
goto next;
}
get_node_info(sbi, dn.nid, &ni);
- f2fs_replace_block(sbi, &dn, dn.data_blkaddr,
+ if (cur->old_addr == NEW_ADDR) {
+ invalidate_blocks(sbi, dn.data_blkaddr);
+ f2fs_update_data_blkaddr(&dn, NEW_ADDR);
+ } else
+ f2fs_replace_block(sbi, &dn, dn.data_blkaddr,
cur->old_addr, ni.version, true, true);
f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
}
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists