lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1458dc6c-bc5f-2a78-2e42-aacfe4328460@windriver.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:08:12 +0800
From:   qhou <qi.hou@...driver.com>
To:     Ladislav Michl <ladis@...ux-mips.org>
CC:     <tony@...mide.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] arm: omap2: timer: fix a kmemleak caused in
 omap_get_timer_dt


On 2018年01月09日 19:52, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 05:24:21PM +0800, Qi Hou wrote:
> > When more than one GP timers are used as kernel system timers and the
> > corresponding nodes in device-tree are marked with the same "disabled"
> > property, then the "attr" field of the property will be initialized
> > more than once as the property being added to sys file system via
> > __of_add_property_sysfs().
> > 
> > In __of_add_property_sysfs(), the "name" field of pp->attr.attr is set
> > directly to the return value of safe_name(), without taking care of
> > whether it's already a valid pointer to a memory block. If it is, its
> > old value will always be overwritten by the new one and the memory block
> > allocated before will a "ghost", then a kmemleak happened.
>
> As timers does not seem to be deallocated, this does not matter in practice.
> Fix eats a bit more from heap.
Yes, there is no timers being deallocated, as I see.

But it is not eligible that sharing the same property among different 
device nodes.
And itexposes kernel info to users. That is not safe.

The fix causes a tiny consumption of heap, maybe it's worth.

--
best regards,
Qi Hou
>
> > That the same "disabled" property being added to different nodes of device
> > tree would cause that kind of kmemleak overhead, at leat once.
> > 
> > To fix it, allocate the property dynamically, and delete static one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qi Hou <qi.hou@...driver.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
> > index ece09c9..206ae8d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
> > @@ -156,12 +156,6 @@ static struct clock_event_device clockevent_gpt = {
> >  	.tick_resume		= omap2_gp_timer_shutdown,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static struct property device_disabled = {
> > -	.name = "status",
> > -	.length = sizeof("disabled"),
> > -	.value = "disabled",
> > -};
> > -
> >  static const struct of_device_id omap_timer_match[] __initconst = {
> >  	{ .compatible = "ti,omap2420-timer", },
> >  	{ .compatible = "ti,omap3430-timer", },
> > @@ -203,8 +197,17 @@ static struct device_node * __init omap_get_timer_dt(const struct of_device_id *
> >  				  of_get_property(np, "ti,timer-secure", NULL)))
> >  			continue;
> >  
> > -		if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "ti,omap-counter32k"))
> > -			of_add_property(np, &device_disabled);
> > +		if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "ti,omap-counter32k")) {
> > +			struct property *prop;
> > +
> > +			prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +			if (!prop)
> > +				return NULL;
> > +			prop->name = "status";
> > +			prop->length = sizeof("disabled");
> > +			prop->value = "disabled";
>
> How about (see drivers/of/unittest.c)?
> prop->value = "disabled";
> prop->length = strlen(prop->value);

It's better. I will do that.

thanks,
Qi Hou
>
> > +			of_add_property(np, prop);
> > +		}
> >  		return np;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Best regards,
Qi Hou
Phone number: +86-10-8477-8608
Address: Floor 15, Building B, Wangjing Plaza, No.9 Zhong-Huan Nanlu, Chaoyang District

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ