[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2F24076F-4679-4F0A-B314-FC695E9D2211@amacapital.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 17:23:02 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, dwmw@...zon.co.uk, pjt@...gle.com,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, thomas.lendacky@....com,
tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, gregkh@...ux-foundation.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, jikos@...nel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/8] x86/entry/clearregs: Clear registers for 64bit exceptions/interrupts
> On Jan 9, 2018, at 5:03 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Clear all registers on entering the 64bit kernel for exceptions and
> interrupts.
>
> Since there are no arguments this is fairly simple.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> index 632081fd7086..6ab4c2aaeabb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> @@ -636,6 +636,7 @@ END(irq_entries_start)
> ALLOC_PT_GPREGS_ON_STACK
> SAVE_C_REGS
> SAVE_EXTRA_REGS
> + CLEAR_ALL_REGS
> ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
>
> testb $3, CS(%rsp)
> @@ -1192,6 +1193,7 @@ ENTRY(xen_failsafe_callback)
> ALLOC_PT_GPREGS_ON_STACK
> SAVE_C_REGS
> SAVE_EXTRA_REGS
> + CLEAR_ALL_REGS
> ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
If CLEAR_ALL_REGS does what it sounds like, then its overkill here.
I could get behind this patch in general, though. Interrupts are so slow the the overhead probably doesn't matter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists