[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-0fa7d181f1a60149061632266bb432b4b61acdac@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 04:19:31 -0800
From: tip-bot for Juri Lelli <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
juri.lelli@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
peterz@...radead.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/cpufreq: Always consider all CPUs when
deciding next freq
Commit-ID: 0fa7d181f1a60149061632266bb432b4b61acdac
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/0fa7d181f1a60149061632266bb432b4b61acdac
Author: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:23:22 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:53:34 +0100
sched/cpufreq: Always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq
No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get
triggered, as there are scheduling policies (like SCHED_DEADLINE) which
don't trigger them so frequently.
Remove such assumption from the code, by always considering
SCHED_DEADLINE utilization signal as not stale.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: alessio.balsini@....com
Cc: bristot@...hat.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@....com
Cc: joelaf@...gle.com
Cc: juri.lelli@...hat.com
Cc: mathieu.poirier@...aro.org
Cc: morten.rasmussen@....com
Cc: patrick.bellasi@....com
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: tkjos@...roid.com
Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it
Cc: vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171204102325.5110-6-juri.lelli@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index e9e0713..dd062a1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -315,17 +315,21 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
s64 delta_ns;
/*
- * If the CPU utilization was last updated before the previous
- * frequency update and the time elapsed between the last update
- * of the CPU utilization and the last frequency update is long
- * enough, don't take the CPU into account as it probably is
- * idle now (and clear iowait_boost for it).
+ * If the CFS CPU utilization was last updated before the
+ * previous frequency update and the time elapsed between the
+ * last update of the CPU utilization and the last frequency
+ * update is long enough, reset iowait_boost and util_cfs, as
+ * they are now probably stale. However, still consider the
+ * CPU contribution if it has some DEADLINE utilization
+ * (util_dl).
*/
delta_ns = time - j_sg_cpu->last_update;
if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC) {
j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = false;
- continue;
+ j_sg_cpu->util_cfs = 0;
+ if (j_sg_cpu->util_dl == 0)
+ continue;
}
if (j_sg_cpu->flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT)
return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists