linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] bitmap: Add bitmap_zero()/bitmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1515589905.7000.847.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:11:45 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] bitmap: Add bitmap_zero()/bitmap_clear() test
 cases

On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 12:34 +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:24:27PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Explicitly test bitmap_zero() and bitmap_clear() functions.

> > +	/* Known way to set all bits */
> 
> Nit: if you start your comments with capital, proceed that way till
> the end.

Right, I have to keep the original style. I'll check this.

> I don't understand what patch #4 is doing in this series. At the first
> glance, it may be applied separately.

It fixes test failures found by patch 2 in the series.
The idea is similar to TDD.

> The rest is looking fine. For 1-3,
> Reviewed-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>

Thanks.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy