[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1515591811.7000.870.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:43:31 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] iommu/vt-d: Add debugfs support for Interrupt
remapping
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 19:48 -0800, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> Debugfs extension for Intel IOMMU to dump Interrupt remapping table
> entries for Interrupt remapping and Interrupt posting.
>
> The file /sys/kernel/debug/intel_iommu/ir_translation_struct provides
> detailed information, such as Index, Source Id, Destination Id, Vector
> and the raw values for entries with the present bit set, in the format
> shown.
>
> Remapped Interrupt supported on IOMMU: dmar5
> IR table address:ffff93e09d54c310
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Index SID Dest_ID Vct Raw_value_high Raw_value_low
> 1 3a00 00000600 2c 0000000000043a00 00000600002c0009
> 111 4301 00000900 a2 0000000000044301 0000090000a20009
>
> Posted Interrupt supported on IOMMU: dmar5
> IR table address:ffff93e09d54c310
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Index SID PDA_high PDA_low Vct Raw_value_high Raw_value_low
> 4 4300 00000010 40c7c880 41 0000001000044300 40c7c88000418001
> 5 4300 00000010 40c7c880 51 0000001000044300 40c7c88000518001
>
>
> + seq_printf(m, "Remapped Interrupt supported on IOMMU:
> %s\n"
> + " IR table address:%p\n", iommu->name,
> + iommu->ir_table);
A nit: If you indent second part of string literal to follow the
indentation of first one, it would be slightly better for my opinion.
> + seq_printf(m, "Posted Interrupt supported on IOMMU:
> %s\n"
> + " IR table address:%p\n", iommu->name,
> + iommu->ir_table);
Ditto.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists