[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9360a280-228d-26d9-5561-6688aa67881c@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 06:06:59 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>, jmattson@...gle.com,
x86@...nel.org, dwmw@...zon.co.uk, bp@...en8.de,
aliguori@...zon.com, thomas.lendacky@....com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] kvm: vmx: pass MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL and
MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD down to the guest
On 1/10/2018 5:20 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> * a simple specification that does "IBRS=1 blocks indirect branch
> prediction altogether" would actually satisfy the specification just as
> well, and it would be nice to know if that's what the processor actually
> does.
it doesn't exactly, not for all.
so you really do need to write ibrs again.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists