[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e17565b1-3f51-3739-b788-d73063454436@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:23:25 -0600
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"jikos@...nel.org" <jikos@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...ux-foundation.org" <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] x86/retpoline: Convert generic specific retpolines
to use RETPOLINE_GENERIC
On 1/10/2018 7:15 AM, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 18:28 -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE has been renamed to X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE_GENERIC.
>> Convert the sequences using it.
>
> AMD documentation says they need the RSB fill too, so these should stay
> under X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE I think.
AMD processors don't fall back to the indirect predictor on an underflow
so this isn't needed on AMD if it is purely for underflow prevention.
Thanks,
Tom
>
>
>
> Amazon Web Services UK Limited. Registered in England and Wales with
> registration number 08650665 and which has its registered office at 60
> Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2FD, United Kingdom.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists