[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1515597857.22302.190.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:24:17 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
"asit.k.mallick" <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
"Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch RFC 5/5] x86/speculation: Add basic speculation control
code
On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 16:13 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> Can you also tell if IBRS must be written as a barrier to SPEC_CTRL in
> return to userland (kernel exit) when ibrs_enabled 2? Generally we
> wouldn't run a barrier there with ibrs_enabled 2, but absolutely
> nothing is intuitive here so I need to ask explicitly.
Since it achieves nothing¹ but to make userspace run slower, there's no
need to write it again on returning to userspace. It will perform that
function just fine without doing so.
(¹ that STIBP doesn't already do, and cheaper)
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5213 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists