[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h7esp1zz8.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:43:23 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Missing watchdog after ACPI watchdog creation failure
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:23:43 +0100,
Mika Westerberg wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 04:13:51PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > on the recent kernels, i2c-i801 skips the creation of iTCO wdt when
> > ACPI WDAT is present. It's fine when ACPI really creates the watchdog
> > device. But, we've got a report showing that the watchdog is missing
> > on some machines because ACPI failed to create, and yet i2c-i801 still
> > skips because acpi_has_watchdog() returns true.
> >
> > More specifically, the machine gets an error from acpi_watchdog.c
> > like:
> > platform wdat_wdt: failed to claim resource 3: [io 0x040a-0x040c]
> > ACPI: watchdog: Device creation failed: -16
> >
> > where the region was registered by pnp,
> > % cat /proc/ioports
> > ....
> > 0400-047f : pnp 00:01
> >
> >
> > One may say that BIOS sucks, but OTOH, the complete lack of watchdog
> > thereafter can be seen as a regression, too. It used to work on the
> > older kernel as iTCO wdt was provided by i2c-i801.
>
> Hmm, if the resource is already taken I wonder how iTCO can work? Are
> you sure iTCO works on those systems?
Yes, that's the reason we got a bug report :)
4.4 kernel worked, and 4.12 (and later) don't.
On 4.4.x,
% /proc/ioports
0000-0cf7 : PCI Bus 0000:00
...
0400-047f : pnp 00:01
0400-041f : iTCO_wdt
0400-041f : iTCO_wdt
0500-0503 : ACPI PM1a_EVT_BLK
On 4.12.x,
% /proc/ioports
0000-0cf7 : PCI Bus 0000:00
...
0400-047f : pnp 00:01
0500-053f : pnp 00:01
> > Shouldn't acpi_has_watchdog() rather checks whether the watchdog
> > device creation succeeded or not?
>
> Yes, or rather we should first figure out what the actual problem is ;-)
>
> Are you able to get acpidump from that system with full dmesg?
I'll ask the reporter.
thanks,
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists