| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20180110154625.4319-6-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:46:19 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
Maged Michael <maged.michael@...il.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
David Sehr <sehr@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 for 4.16 05/11] membarrier: provide SHARED_EXPEDITED command
Allow expedited membarrier to be used for data shared between processes
(shared memory).
Processes wishing to receive the membarriers register with
MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED. Those which want to issue
membarrier invoke MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED.
This allows extremely simple kernel-level implementation: we have almost
everything we need with the PRIVATE_EXPEDITED barrier code. All we need
to do is to add a flag in the mm_struct that will be used to check
whether we need to send the IPI to the current thread of each CPU.
There is a slight downside to this approach compared to targeting
specific shared memory users: when performing a membarrier operation,
all registered "shared" receivers will get the barrier, even if they
don't share a memory mapping with the "sender" issuing
MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED.
This registration approach seems to fit the requirement of not
disturbing processes that really deeply care about real-time: they
simply should not register with MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>
CC: Maged Michael <maged.michael@...il.com>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
CC: Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
CC: x86@...nel.org
---
Changes since v1:
- Add missing preempt disable around smp_call_function_many().
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h | 3 +-
include/linux/sched/mm.h | 6 +-
include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h | 34 ++++++++--
kernel/sched/membarrier.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
4 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h
index 98ff4f1fcf2b..20cd79ed3fc6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h
@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ static inline void membarrier_arch_switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev,
* store to rq->curr.
*/
if (likely(!(atomic_read(&next->membarrier_state) &
- MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED) || !prev))
+ (MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED |
+ MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED)) || !prev))
return;
/*
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
index 28aef7051d73..cbeecd287589 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
@@ -219,8 +219,10 @@ static inline void memalloc_noreclaim_restore(unsigned int flags)
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMBARRIER
enum {
- MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_READY = (1U << 0),
- MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED = (1U << 1),
+ MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_READY = (1U << 0),
+ MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED = (1U << 1),
+ MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED_READY = (1U << 2),
+ MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED = (1U << 3),
};
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_HOOKS
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h b/include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h
index 4e01ad7ffe98..2de01e595d3b 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h
@@ -40,6 +40,28 @@
* (non-running threads are de facto in such a
* state). This covers threads from all processes
* running on the system. This command returns 0.
+ * @MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED:
+ * Execute a memory barrier on all running threads
+ * part of a process which previously registered
+ * with MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED.
+ * Upon return from system call, the caller thread
+ * is ensured that all running threads have passed
+ * through a state where all memory accesses to
+ * user-space addresses match program order between
+ * entry to and return from the system call
+ * (non-running threads are de facto in such a
+ * state). This only covers threads from processes
+ * which registered with
+ * MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED.
+ * This command returns 0. Given that
+ * registration is about the intent to receive
+ * the barriers, it is valid to invoke
+ * MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED from a
+ * non-registered process.
+ * @MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED:
+ * Register the process intent to receive
+ * MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED memory
+ * barriers. Always returns 0.
* @MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED:
* Execute a memory barrier on each running
* thread belonging to the same process as the current
@@ -70,12 +92,12 @@
* the value 0.
*/
enum membarrier_cmd {
- MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY = 0,
- MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED = (1 << 0),
- /* reserved for MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED (1 << 1) */
- /* reserved for MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE (1 << 2) */
- MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED = (1 << 3),
- MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED = (1 << 4),
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY = 0,
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED = (1 << 0),
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED = (1 << 1),
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED = (1 << 2),
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED = (1 << 3),
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED = (1 << 4),
};
#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_MEMBARRIER_H */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
index 678577267a9a..14bc8bf9e736 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
@@ -27,7 +27,9 @@
* except MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY.
*/
#define MEMBARRIER_CMD_BITMASK \
- (MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED | MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED \
+ (MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED | MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED \
+ | MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED \
+ | MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED \
| MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED)
static void ipi_mb(void *info)
@@ -35,6 +37,73 @@ static void ipi_mb(void *info)
smp_mb(); /* IPIs should be serializing but paranoid. */
}
+static int membarrier_shared_expedited(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ bool fallback = false;
+ cpumask_var_t tmpmask;
+
+ if (num_online_cpus() == 1)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Matches memory barriers around rq->curr modification in
+ * scheduler.
+ */
+ smp_mb(); /* system call entry is not a mb. */
+
+ /*
+ * Expedited membarrier commands guarantee that they won't
+ * block, hence the GFP_NOWAIT allocation flag and fallback
+ * implementation.
+ */
+ if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&tmpmask, GFP_NOWAIT)) {
+ /* Fallback for OOM. */
+ fallback = true;
+ }
+
+ cpus_read_lock();
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
+ /*
+ * Skipping the current CPU is OK even through we can be
+ * migrated at any point. The current CPU, at the point
+ * where we read raw_smp_processor_id(), is ensured to
+ * be in program order with respect to the caller
+ * thread. Therefore, we can skip this CPU from the
+ * iteration.
+ */
+ if (cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
+ continue;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ p = task_rcu_dereference(&cpu_rq(cpu)->curr);
+ if (p && p->mm && (atomic_read(&p->mm->membarrier_state) &
+ MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED)) {
+ if (!fallback)
+ __cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, tmpmask);
+ else
+ smp_call_function_single(cpu, ipi_mb, NULL, 1);
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ }
+ if (!fallback) {
+ preempt_disable();
+ smp_call_function_many(tmpmask, ipi_mb, NULL, 1);
+ preempt_enable();
+ free_cpumask_var(tmpmask);
+ }
+ cpus_read_unlock();
+
+ /*
+ * Memory barrier on the caller thread _after_ we finished
+ * waiting for the last IPI. Matches memory barriers around
+ * rq->curr modification in scheduler.
+ */
+ smp_mb(); /* exit from system call is not a mb */
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int membarrier_private_expedited(void)
{
int cpu;
@@ -105,7 +174,38 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(void)
return 0;
}
-static void membarrier_register_private_expedited(void)
+static int membarrier_register_shared_expedited(void)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p = current;
+ struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
+
+ if (atomic_read(&mm->membarrier_state) &
+ MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED_READY)
+ return 0;
+ atomic_or(MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED, &mm->membarrier_state);
+ if (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 1 && get_nr_threads(p) == 1) {
+ /*
+ * For single mm user, single threaded process, we can
+ * simply issue a memory barrier after setting
+ * MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED to guarantee that
+ * no memory access following registration is reordered
+ * before registration.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * For multi-mm user threads, we need to ensure all
+ * future scheduler executions will observe the new
+ * thread flag state for this mm.
+ */
+ synchronize_sched();
+ }
+ atomic_or(MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED_READY,
+ &mm->membarrier_state);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int membarrier_register_private_expedited(void)
{
struct task_struct *p = current;
struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
@@ -117,7 +217,7 @@ static void membarrier_register_private_expedited(void)
*/
if (atomic_read(&mm->membarrier_state)
& MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_READY)
- return;
+ return 0;
atomic_or(MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED, &mm->membarrier_state);
if (!(atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 1 && get_nr_threads(p) == 1)) {
/*
@@ -128,6 +228,7 @@ static void membarrier_register_private_expedited(void)
}
atomic_or(MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_READY,
&mm->membarrier_state);
+ return 0;
}
/**
@@ -177,11 +278,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(membarrier, int, cmd, int, flags)
if (num_online_cpus() > 1)
synchronize_sched();
return 0;
+ case MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED:
+ return membarrier_shared_expedited();
+ case MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED:
+ return membarrier_register_shared_expedited();
case MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED:
return membarrier_private_expedited();
case MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED:
- membarrier_register_private_expedited();
- return 0;
+ return membarrier_register_private_expedited();
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists