[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7558007d-3699-f456-7ddf-2f96339a7f98@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:54:22 +0100
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>
Cc: Kernel Build Reports Mailman List
<kernel-build-reports@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, Roger He <Hongbo.He@....com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>,
Francisco Jerez <currojerez@...eup.net>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: next/master build: 198 builds: 1 failed, 197 passed, 1 error, 148
warnings (next-20180110)
Hi Arnd,
Am 10.01.2018 um 16:45 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
>> 14 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c:1186:2: warning: ignoring return value of 'register_shrinker', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
>> 14 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc.c:485:2: warning: ignoring return value of 'register_shrinker', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
> ttm and kvm are now the last user of register_shrinker that doesn't
> propagate the return code to its
> caller, all other callers got fixed in one way or another.
>
> I tried to fix this one too, but couldn't come up with a proper way of
> unwinding both
> kobject_init_and_add() and ttm_pool_mm_shrink_init():
>
> ret = kobject_init_and_add(&_manager->kobj, &ttm_pool_kobj_type,
> &glob->kobj, "pool");
> if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
> kobject_put(&_manager->kobj);
> _manager = NULL;
> return ret;
> }
>
> ttm_pool_mm_shrink_init(_manager);
>
> Calling kobject_put() after a failed kobject_init_and_add() seemed wrong,
> and it also appears to be missing a kfree(), so I didn't want to mess it
> up any further. Added a few people to Cc that touched this file most,
> maybe one of them can have a look, or they already have a patch waiting
> to get merged.
That isn't urgent, isn't it? So I would say I put it on my TODO list and
I'm going to take care of it no later than 4.17.
Otherwise Roger or me could take a look tomorrow.
Regards,
Christian.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists