[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKX4t8mw=YHxtQbS65OhEjPA2ZpE+puDORxCGjUc_Miyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:19:12 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/13] drivers: Boot Constraint core
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:42 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 10-01-18, 09:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 09:14:40AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> > On 09-01-18, 19:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > > Can you resend this? As you can tell, I've been a bit busy for the past
>> > > month or so :(
>> >
>> > Sure.
>> >
>> > > Also, why is there no signed-off-by on the OF core patches?
>> >
>> > A bit confused, sorry. Are you looking for my signed-off ? They are already
>> > there.
>> >
>> > Or are you looking for Rob's (OF maintainer) signed-off ?
>>
>> Looking for Rob's, why hasn't he reviewed this yet?
I did review the whole series on version v4... The whole thing seems
pretty hacky to me. OTOH, I don't know if there's an elegant solution
to this problem. This also tries to be a general solution for what's
largely an earlycon (which is, news flash, a debug tool) and displays
for which we already address at least some of this with simplefb (not
that it is a great solution either). I've yet to hear of any other
concrete uses for this.
> He went through them for sure but never gave his Ack. I have asked him to
> provide Acks for the first 2 patches this morning, if they look fine to him.
The drivers/of/ changes on their own are innocent enough if there's a
reason (We generally want users using of_platform_populate rather than
of_platform_bus_create, so that's why it's not exported now.). It's
really all the rest that concerns me.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists