[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwtUySpD=BP4+cMJf-x5EXbhKmiFD0XXNhGCWw9o6Nrdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:59:19 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Thomas Voegtle <tv@...96.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/37] 4.4.110-stable review
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Steven Sistare
<steven.sistare@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, and addressing Linus' concern about EFI_OLD_MEMMAP, those paths are
> independent of it. When EFI_OLD_MMAP is enabled, the efi pgd is not
> used, and the bug will not bite.
Ok, good. Thanks for checking.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists