[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180111004508.GA3320@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:45:08 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: RCU: Call touch_nmi_watchdog() while printing stall warnings
On (01/10/18 06:57), Tejun Heo wrote:
[..]
> > diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> > index 9960f8842b31..649c00a9af12 100644
> > --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> > +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> > @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
> > #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> > #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > #include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
> > +#include <linux/nmi.h>
> >
> > #include "workqueue_internal.h"
> >
> > @@ -4473,6 +4474,8 @@ void show_workqueue_state(void)
> > if (pwq->nr_active || !list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works))
> > show_pwq(pwq);
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + touch_nmi_watchdog();
>
> Can you send a patch w/ signed-off-by adding touch_nmi_watchdog() to
> both outer loops in that function. Theoretically, we can have a lot
> of pools too.
thanks. will do.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists