| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 06:28:04 +0000
From: Jiaying Liang <jliang@...inx.com>
To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
"ohad@...ery.com" <ohad@...ery.com>,
"bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC] rpmsg: virtio rpmsg: Add RPMsg char driver support
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnaud Pouliquen [mailto:arnaud.pouliquen@...com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 4:56 AM
> To: Jiaying Liang <jliang@...inx.com>; ohad@...ery.com;
> bjorn.andersson@...aro.org
> Cc: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] rpmsg: virtio rpmsg: Add RPMsg char driver support
>
>
>
> On 01/05/2018 11:10 PM, Jiaying Liang wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Arnaud Pouliquen [mailto:arnaud.pouliquen@...com]
> >> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2018 6:48 AM
> >> To: Jiaying Liang <jliang@...inx.com>; ohad@...ery.com;
> >> bjorn.andersson@...aro.org
> >> Cc: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> >> Jiaying Liang <jliang@...inx.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC] rpmsg: virtio rpmsg: Add RPMsg char driver support
> >>
> >> Hi Wendy,
> >>
> >> Few remarks on your patch.
> >>
> >> On 01/05/2018 12:18 AM, Wendy Liang wrote:
> >>> virtio rpmsg was not implemented to use RPMsg char driver.
> >>> Each virtio ns announcement will create a new RPMsg device which is
> >>> supposed to bound to a RPMsg driver. It doesn't support dynamic
> >>> endpoints with name service per RPMsg device.
> >>> With RPMsg char driver, you can have multiple endpoints per RPMsg
> >>> device.
> >>>
> >>> Here is the change from this patch:
> >>> * Introduce a macro to indicate if want to use RPMsg char driver
> >>> for virtio RPMsg. The RPMsg device can either be bounded to
> >>> a simple RPMsg driver or the RPMsg char driver.
> >>> * Create Virtio RPMsg char device when the virtio RPMsg driver is
> >>> probed.
> >>> * when there is a remote service announced, keep it in the virtio
> >>> proc remote services list.
> >>> * when there is an endpoint created, bind it to a remote service
> >>> from the remote services list. If the service doesn't exist yet,
> >>> create one and mark the service address as ANY.
> >> Would be nice to simplify the review if patch was split in several
> >> patches (for instance per feature introduced).
> > [Wendy] These changes are made to use the RPMsg char driver.
> > Some items such when an endpoint is created while the remote hasn't
> > announced this service yet is "new feature", but at the moment I am
> > not 100% sure if this change follows the right direction.
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Wendy Liang <jliang@...inx.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> We have different userspace applications to use RPMsg differently,
> >>> what we need is a RPMsg char driver which can supports multiple
> >>> endpoints per remote device.
> >>> The virtio rpmsg driver at the moment doesn't support the RPMsg char
> >>> driver.
> >>> Please advise if this is patch is the right direction. If not, any
> >>> suggestions? Thanks
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/rpmsg/Kconfig | 8 +
> >>> drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 364
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>> 2 files changed, 365 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/Kconfig b/drivers/rpmsg/Kconfig index
> >>> 65a9f6b..746f07e 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/Kconfig
> >>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/Kconfig
> >>> @@ -52,4 +52,12 @@ config RPMSG_VIRTIO
> >>> select RPMSG
> >>> select VIRTIO
> >>>
> >>> +config RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + bool "Enable Virtio RPMSG char device driver support"
> >>> + default y
> >>> + depends on RPMSG_VIRTIO
> >>> + depends on RPMSG_CHAR
> >>> + help
> >>> + Say y here to enable to use RPMSG char device interface.
> >>> +
> >>> endmenu
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> >>> b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> >>> index 82b8300..6e30a3cc 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> >>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
> >>> * @sendq: wait queue of sending contexts waiting for a tx
> buffers
> >>> * @sleepers: number of senders that are waiting for a tx buffer
> >>> * @ns_ept: the bus's name service endpoint
> >>> + * @rsvcs: remote services
> >>> *
> >>> * This structure stores the rpmsg state of a given virtio remote
> processor
> >>> * device (there might be several virtio proc devices for each
> >>> physical @@ -75,6 +76,9 @@ struct virtproc_info {
> >>> wait_queue_head_t sendq;
> >>> atomic_t sleepers;
> >>> struct rpmsg_endpoint *ns_ept;
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + struct list_head rsvcs;
> >>> +#endif
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> /* The feature bitmap for virtio rpmsg */ @@ -141,6 +145,36 @@
> >>> struct virtio_rpmsg_channel { #define to_virtio_rpmsg_channel(_rpdev)
> \
> >>> container_of(_rpdev, struct virtio_rpmsg_channel, rpdev)
> >>>
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc - virtio RPMsg remote service
> >>> + * @name: name of the RPMsg remote service
> >>> + * @addr: RPMsg address of the remote service
> >>> + * @ept: local endpoint bound to the remote service
> >>> + * @node: list node
> >>> + */
> >>> +struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc {
> >>> + char name[RPMSG_NAME_SIZE];
> >>> + u32 addr;
> >>> + struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept;
> >>> + struct list_head node;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * struct virtio_rpmsg_ept - virtio RPMsg endpoint
> >>> + * @rsvc: RPMsg service
> >>> + * @ept: RPMsg endpoint
> >>> + *
> >>> + */
> >>> +struct virtio_rpmsg_ept {
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc *rsvc;
> >>> + struct rpmsg_endpoint ept;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +#define to_virtio_rpmsg_ept(_ept) \
> >>> + container_of(_ept, struct virtio_rpmsg_ept, ept) #endif
> >>> +
> >>> /*
> >>> * We're allocating buffers of 512 bytes each for communications. The
> >>> * number of buffers will be computed from the number of buffers
> >>> supported @@ -216,6 +250,199 @@ rpmsg_sg_init(struct scatterlist
> >>> *sg,
> >> void *cpu_addr, unsigned int len)
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * virtio_rpmsg_find_rsvc_by_name - find the announced remote
> >>> +service
> >>> + * @vrp: virtio remote proc information
> >>> + * @name: remote service name
> >>> + *
> >>> + * The caller is supposed to have mutex lock before calling this
> >>> +function
> >>> + *
> >>> + * return NULL if no remote service has been found, otherwise,
> >>> +return
> >>> + * the remote service pointer.
> >>> + */
> >>> +static struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc *
> >>> +virtio_rpmsg_find_rsvc_by_name(struct virtproc_info *vrp, char
> >>> +*name) {
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc *rsvc;
> >>> +
> >>> + list_for_each_entry(rsvc, &vrp->rsvcs, node) {
> >>> + if (!strncmp(rsvc->name, name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE))
> >>> + /* remote service has found */
> >>> + return rsvc;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return NULL;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * virtio_rpmsg_create_rsvc_by_name - create remote service
> >>> + * @vrp: virtio remote proc information
> >>> + * @name: remote service name
> >>> + *
> >>> + * The caller is supposed to have mutex lock before calling this
> >>> +function
> >>> + *
> >>> + * return NULL if remote service creation failed. otherwise, return
> >>> + * the remote service pointer.
> >>> + */
> >>> +static struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc *
> >>> +virtio_rpmsg_create_rsvc_by_name(struct virtproc_info *vrp, char
> >>> +*name) {
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc *rsvc;
> >>> +
> >>> + rsvc = virtio_rpmsg_find_rsvc_by_name(vrp, name);
> >>> + if (rsvc)
> >>> + return rsvc;
> >> Here, I think you break the possibility to instantiate several times
> >> the same service .
> >> For instance, today if you have 2 communications in parallel:
> >> Core1_Aplli1 <-- "foo" service --> core2_appli1
> >> Core1_Aplli2 <-- "foo" service --> core2_appli2
> > [Wendy] I can add the remote service address to the input argument
> > That is to identify a remote service, it will be the "name" + service address.
> >>
> >> 2 ways to do it:
> >> 1) one service and 4 endpoints
> >> => issue it to know the destination address.
> >> 2) 2 instances of the same service with default endpoint.
> >>
> >>> + rsvc = kzalloc(sizeof(*rsvc), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> + if (!rsvc)
> >>> + return NULL;
> >>> + strncpy(rsvc->name, name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
> >>> + list_add_tail(&rsvc->node, &vrp->rsvcs);
> >>> + return rsvc;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * virtio_rpmsg_remove_rsvc_by_name - remove remote service
> >>> + * @vrp: virtio remote proc information
> >>> + * @name: remote service name
> >>> + *
> >>> + */
> >>> +static void
> >>> +virtio_rpmsg_remove_rsvc_by_name(struct virtproc_info *vrp, char
> >>> +*name) {
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc *rsvc;
> >>> + struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept;
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_ept *vept;
> >>> +
> >>> + mutex_lock(&vrp->endpoints_lock);
> >>> + list_for_each_entry(rsvc, &vrp->rsvcs, node) {
> >>> + if (!strncmp(rsvc->name, name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE)) {
> >>> + /* remote service has found, no need to
> >>> + * create
> >>> + */
> >>> + ept = rsvc->ept;
> >>> + if (ept) {
> >>> + vept = to_virtio_rpmsg_ept(ept);
> >>> + vept->rsvc = NULL;
> >>> + }
> >>> + list_del(&rsvc->node);
> >>> + kfree(rsvc);
> >>> + break;
> >>> + }
> >>> + }
> >>> + mutex_unlock(&vrp->endpoints_lock);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * virtio_rpmsg_create_rsvc - create remote service with channel
> >>> +information
> >>> + * @vrp: virtio remote proc information
> >>> + * @chinfo: channel information
> >>> + *
> >>> + * return remote service pointer if it is successfully created;
> >>> +otherwise,
> >>> + * return NULL.
> >>> + */
> >>> +static struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc *
> >>> +virtio_rpmsg_create_rsvc(struct virtproc_info *vrp,
> >>> + struct rpmsg_channel_info *chinfo) {
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc *rsvc;
> >>> +
> >>> + mutex_lock(&vrp->endpoints_lock);
> >>> + rsvc = virtio_rpmsg_create_rsvc_by_name(vrp, chinfo->name);
> >>> + if (rsvc) {
> >>> + struct virtio_device *vdev = vrp->vdev;
> >>> +
> >>> + rsvc->addr = chinfo->dst;
> >>> + dev_info(&vdev->dev, "Remote has announced
> >> service %s, %d.\n",
> >>> + chinfo->name, rsvc->addr);
> >>> + }
> >>> + mutex_unlock(&vrp->endpoints_lock);
> >>> + return rsvc;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * virtio_rpmsg_announce_ept_create - announce endpoint has been
> >>> +created
> >>> + * @ept: RPMsg endpoint
> >>> + *
> >>> + * return 0 if succeeded, otherwise, return error code.
> >>> + */
> >>> +static int virtio_rpmsg_announce_ept_create(struct rpmsg_endpoint
> >>> +*ept) {
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_ept *vept = to_virtio_rpmsg_ept(ept);
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc *rsvc = vept->rsvc;
> >>> + struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch;
> >>> + struct virtproc_info *vrp;
> >>> + struct device *dev;
> >>> + int err = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!rpdev)
> >>> + /* If the endpoint is not connected to a RPMsg device,
> >>> + * no need to send the announcement.
> >>> + */
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> + vch = to_virtio_rpmsg_channel(rpdev);
> >>> + vrp = vch->vrp;
> >>> + dev = &ept->rpdev->dev;
> >>> + /* need to tell remote processor's name service about this channel ?
> >> */
> >>> + if (virtio_has_feature(vrp->vdev, VIRTIO_RPMSG_F_NS)) {
> >>> + struct rpmsg_ns_msg nsm;
> >>> +
> >>> + strncpy(nsm.name, rsvc->name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
> >>> + nsm.addr = ept->addr;
> >>> + nsm.flags = RPMSG_NS_CREATE;
> >>> +
> >>> + err = rpmsg_sendto(ept, &nsm, sizeof(nsm),
> >>> + RPMSG_NS_ADDR);
> >>> + if (err)
> >>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to announce service %d\n", err);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return err;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * virtio_rpmsg_announce_ept_destroy - announce endpoint has been
> >>> +destroyed
> >>> + * @ept: RPMsg endpoint
> >>> + *
> >>> + * return 0 if succeeded, otherwise, return error code.
> >>> + */
> >>> +static int virtio_rpmsg_announce_ept_destroy(struct rpmsg_endpoint
> >>> +*ept) {
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_ept *vept = to_virtio_rpmsg_ept(ept);
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc *rsvc = vept->rsvc;
> >>> + struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch;
> >>> + struct virtproc_info *vrp;
> >>> + struct device *dev;
> >>> + int err = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!rpdev)
> >>> + /* If the endpoint is not connected to a RPMsg device,
> >>> + * no need to send the announcement.
> >>> + */
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> + vch = to_virtio_rpmsg_channel(rpdev);
> >>> + vrp = vch->vrp;
> >>> + dev = &ept->rpdev->dev;
> >>> + /* tell remote processor's name service we're removing this
> >>> +channel
> >> */
> >>> + if (virtio_has_feature(vrp->vdev, VIRTIO_RPMSG_F_NS)) {
> >>> + struct rpmsg_ns_msg nsm;
> >>> +
> >>> + strncpy(nsm.name, rsvc->name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
> >>> + nsm.addr = ept->addr;
> >>> + nsm.flags = RPMSG_NS_DESTROY;
> >>> +
> >>> + err = rpmsg_sendto(ept, &nsm, sizeof(nsm),
> >>> + RPMSG_NS_ADDR);
> >>> + if (err)
> >>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to announce service %d\n", err);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return err;
> >>> +}
> >>> +#endif
> >>> +
> >>> /**
> >>> * __ept_release() - deallocate an rpmsg endpoint
> >>> * @kref: the ept's reference count @@ -229,26 +456,53 @@ static
> >>> void __ept_release(struct kref *kref) {
> >>> struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept = container_of(kref, struct
> >> rpmsg_endpoint,
> >>> refcount);
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_ept *vept = to_virtio_rpmsg_ept(ept);
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch;
> >>> + struct virtproc_info *vrp;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (ept->rpdev) {
> >>> + vch = to_virtio_rpmsg_channel(ept->rpdev);
> >>> + vrp = vch->vrp;
> >>> + (void)virtio_rpmsg_announce_ept_destroy(ept);
> >>> + mutex_lock(&vrp->endpoints_lock);
> >>> + vept->rsvc->ept = NULL;
> >>> + mutex_unlock(&vrp->endpoints_lock);
> >>> + }
> >>> + kfree(vept);
> >>> +#else
> >>> /*
> >>> * At this point no one holds a reference to ept anymore,
> >>> * so we can directly free it
> >>> */
> >>> kfree(ept);
> >>> +#endif
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> /* for more info, see below documentation of rpmsg_create_ept() */
> >>> static struct rpmsg_endpoint *__rpmsg_create_ept(struct
> >>> virtproc_info
> >> *vrp,
> >>> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> >>> rpmsg_rx_cb_t cb,
> >>> - void *priv, u32 addr)
> >>> + void *priv,
> >>> + struct rpmsg_channel_info
> >> *ch)
> >>> {
> >>> int id_min, id_max, id;
> >>> struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept;
> >>> + u32 addr = ch->src;
> >>> struct device *dev = rpdev ? &rpdev->dev : &vrp->vdev->dev;
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_ept *vept;
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc *rsvc;
> >>>
> >>> + vept = kzalloc(sizeof(*vept), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> + if (!vept)
> >>> + return NULL;
> >>> + ept = &vept->ept;
> >>> +#else
> >>> ept = kzalloc(sizeof(*ept), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> if (!ept)
> >>> return NULL;
> >>> +#endif
> >>>
> >>> kref_init(&ept->refcount);
> >>> mutex_init(&ept->cb_lock);
> >>> @@ -259,7 +513,7 @@ static struct rpmsg_endpoint
> >> *__rpmsg_create_ept(struct virtproc_info *vrp,
> >>> ept->ops = &virtio_endpoint_ops;
> >>>
> >>> /* do we need to allocate a local address ? */
> >>> - if (addr == RPMSG_ADDR_ANY) {
> >>> + if (ch->src == RPMSG_ADDR_ANY) {
> >>> id_min = RPMSG_RESERVED_ADDRESSES;
> >>> id_max = 0;
> >>> } else {
> >>> @@ -277,6 +531,19 @@ static struct rpmsg_endpoint
> >> *__rpmsg_create_ept(struct virtproc_info *vrp,
> >>> }
> >>> ept->addr = id;
> >>>
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + if (ept->addr != RPMSG_NS_ADDR) {
> >>> + rsvc = virtio_rpmsg_create_rsvc_by_name(vrp, ch->name);
> >>> + if (!rsvc)
> >>> + goto free_ept;
> >>> + vept->rsvc = rsvc;
> >>> + rsvc->ept = ept;
> >>> + dev_info(&vrp->vdev->dev, "RPMsg ept
> >> created, %s:%d,%d.\n",
> >>> + ch->name, ept->addr, rsvc->addr);
> >>> + (void)virtio_rpmsg_announce_ept_create(ept);
> >>> + }
> >>> +#endif
> >>> +
> >>> mutex_unlock(&vrp->endpoints_lock);
> >>>
> >>> return ept;
> >>> @@ -294,7 +561,7 @@ static struct rpmsg_endpoint
> >>> *virtio_rpmsg_create_ept(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev {
> >>> struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch = to_virtio_rpmsg_channel(rpdev);
> >>>
> >>> - return __rpmsg_create_ept(vch->vrp, rpdev, cb, priv, chinfo.src);
> >>> + return __rpmsg_create_ept(vch->vrp, rpdev, cb, priv, &chinfo);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> /**
> >>> @@ -392,6 +659,7 @@ static void virtio_rpmsg_release_device(struct
> >> device *dev)
> >>> kfree(vch);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +#ifndef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> /*
> >>> * create an rpmsg channel using its name and address info.
> >>> * this function will be used to create both static and dynamic @@
> >>> -444,6 +712,7 @@ static struct rpmsg_device
> >>> *rpmsg_create_channel(struct virtproc_info *vrp,
> >>>
> >>> return rpdev;
> >>> }
> >>> +#endif
> >>>
> >>> /* super simple buffer "allocator" that is just enough for now */
> >>> static void *get_a_tx_buf(struct virtproc_info *vrp) @@ -660,8
> >>> +929,21 @@ static int rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(struct rpmsg_device
> >>> *rpdev, static int virtio_rpmsg_send(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept,
> >>> void *data, int len) {
> >>> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> >>> - u32 src = ept->addr, dst = rpdev->dst;
> >>> + u32 src = ept->addr;
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_ept *vept = to_virtio_rpmsg_ept(ept);
> >>> + u32 dst = vept->rsvc->addr;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (dst == RPMSG_ADDR_ANY)
> >>> + return -EPIPE;
> >>> +#else
> >>> + u32 dst = rpdev->dst;
> >>> +#endif
> >>>
> >>> + if (!rpdev) {
> >>> + pr_err("%s, ept %p rpdev is NULL\n", __func__, ept);
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> + }
> >>> return rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(rpdev, src, dst, data, len,
> >>> true); }
> >>>
> >>> @@ -685,7 +967,16 @@ static int virtio_rpmsg_send_offchannel(struct
> >>> rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src, static int
> >>> virtio_rpmsg_trysend(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len) {
> >>> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> >>> - u32 src = ept->addr, dst = rpdev->dst;
> >>> + u32 src = ept->addr;
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_ept *vept = to_virtio_rpmsg_ept(ept);
> >>> + u32 dst = vept->rsvc->addr;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (dst == RPMSG_ADDR_ANY)
> >>> + return -EPIPE;
> >>> +#else
> >>> + u32 dst = rpdev->dst;
> >>> +#endif
> >>>
> >>> return rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(rpdev, src, dst, data, len,
> >>> false); } @@ -824,11 +1115,13 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct
> >>> rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, int len,
> >>> void *priv, u32 src)
> >>> {
> >>> struct rpmsg_ns_msg *msg = data;
> >>> - struct rpmsg_device *newch;
> >>> struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo;
> >>> struct virtproc_info *vrp = priv;
> >>> struct device *dev = &vrp->vdev->dev;
> >>> +#ifndef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + struct rpmsg_device *newch;
> >>> int ret;
> >>> +#endif
> >>>
> >>> #if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)
> >>> dynamic_hex_dump("NS announcement: ", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE, 16,
> >> 1, @@
> >>> -863,13 +1156,25 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device
> >>> *rpdev,
> >> void *data, int len,
> >>> chinfo.dst = msg->addr;
> >>>
> >>> if (msg->flags & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) {
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + virtio_rpmsg_remove_rsvc_by_name(vrp, chinfo.name); #else
> >>> ret = rpmsg_unregister_device(&vrp->vdev->dev, &chinfo);
> >>> if (ret)
> >>> dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_destroy_channel failed: %d\n",
> >> ret);
> >>> +#endif
> >>> } else {
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc *rsvc;
> >>> +
> >>> + rsvc = virtio_rpmsg_create_rsvc(vrp, &chinfo);
> >>> + if (!rsvc)
> >>> + dev_err(dev, "virtio_rpmsg_create_rsvc failed\n");
> >> #else
> >>> newch = rpmsg_create_channel(vrp, &chinfo);
> >>> if (!newch)
> >>> dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_create_channel failed\n");
> >>> +#endif
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> return 0;
> >>> @@ -885,6 +1190,10 @@ static int rpmsg_probe(struct virtio_device
> *vdev)
> >>> int err = 0, i;
> >>> size_t total_buf_space;
> >>> bool notify;
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch;
> >>> + struct rpmsg_device *rp_char_dev;
> >>> +#endif
> >>>
> >>> vrp = kzalloc(sizeof(*vrp), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> if (!vrp)
> >>> @@ -956,9 +1265,14 @@ static int rpmsg_probe(struct virtio_device
> >>> *vdev)
> >>>
> >>> /* if supported by the remote processor, enable the name service */
> >>> if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RPMSG_F_NS)) {
> >>> + struct rpmsg_channel_info ns_chinfo;
> >>> +
> >>> + ns_chinfo.src = RPMSG_NS_ADDR;
> >>> + ns_chinfo.dst = RPMSG_NS_ADDR;
> >>> + strcpy(ns_chinfo.name, "name_service");
> >>> /* a dedicated endpoint handles the name service msgs */
> >>> vrp->ns_ept = __rpmsg_create_ept(vrp, NULL, rpmsg_ns_cb,
> >>> - vrp, RPMSG_NS_ADDR);
> >>> + vrp, &ns_chinfo);
> >>> if (!vrp->ns_ept) {
> >>> dev_err(&vdev->dev, "failed to create the ns ept\n");
> >>> err = -ENOMEM;
> >>> @@ -966,6 +1280,32 @@ static int rpmsg_probe(struct virtio_device
> *vdev)
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + vch = kzalloc(sizeof(*vch), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> + if (!vch) {
> >>> + err = -ENOMEM;
> >>> + goto free_coherent;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Link the channel to our vrp */
> >>> + vch->vrp = vrp;
> >>> + /* Initialize remote services list */
> >>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vrp->rsvcs);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Assign public information to the rpmsg_device */
> >>> + rp_char_dev = &vch->rpdev;
> >>> + rp_char_dev->ops = &virtio_rpmsg_ops;
> >>> +
> >>> + rp_char_dev->dev.parent = &vrp->vdev->dev;
> >>> + rp_char_dev->dev.release = virtio_rpmsg_release_device;
> >>> + err = rpmsg_chrdev_register_device(rp_char_dev);
> >>
> >> I also tried to use this char device to expose rpmsg service for application.
> >> Issue with this device (from my point of view) is that it has to be
> >> relied on a kernel rpmsg device.
> >> I suppose that your need is to expose RMPSG to userland without
> >> creating a platform driver.
> >> In this case perhaps an alternative could be to move this part in
> >> rmpsg_char to allow to probe it in standalone...
> > [Wendy] with the existing virtio rpmsg implementation, each service
> > will be binded to a rpmsg_device. Each rpmsg_device can have multiple
> static endpoints.
> > But this is different to how rpmsg_char is supposed to use, rpmsg_char
> > looks to me Each endpoint created by rpmsg_char, either dynamic
> > (without knowing the remote Address beforehand) or static(specifying
> > the remote endpoint) should be binded to a service.
> >
> > rpmsg_char user APIs can meet what we need, however, we uses rpmsg
> over virtio.
> > But at the moment the virtio_rpmsg doesn't support rpmsg_char.
> > You talked about the allow rpmsg_char to be probed in standalone, I
> > think that's good Idea, however, we need to bind the rpmsg_char to the
> virtio rpmsg device.
> remoteproc binds rpmsg with virtio, so calling register_rpmsg_driver should
> do the job.
>
> >
> > How about to have "driver_override" of rpmsg_device exposed to
> > userspace with channel name information available (sysfs) and then we
> > can dynamically bind it to rpmsg_char driver from userspace? And then
> > we can limit the rpmsg_char create endpoint feature to only create static
> endpoints over the same channel in case of virtio_rpmsg usage?
>
> Creating a specific device could be another solution. I have no opinion on
> what could be the best strategy.
> Bjorn, what is your feeling?
[Wendy] I just noticed that Anup has sent a patch to add "driver_override".
>
> A constraint to add in design is that we should not expose all the rpmsg
> device to userland. Except if i missed something, it seems that activating
> RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR config exposes all the rpmsg devices.
[Wendy] just wonder with "driver_override", can we limit to apply to those
RPMsg device which is not bound to any driver yet?
>
> Another alternative is to expose rpmsg to userland trough some generic
> interfaces like proxy, tty, FS posix....
[Wendy] Yes, but it needs to have RPMsg driver for each of them.
>
> Thanks,
> Arnaud
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wendy
> >
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Arnaud
> >>
> >>> + if (err) {
> >>> + kfree(vch);
> >>> + goto free_coherent;
> >>> + }
> >>> + dev_info(&vdev->dev, "Registered as RPMsg char device.\n"); #endif
> >>> +
> >>> /*
> >>> * Prepare to kick but don't notify yet - we can't do this before
> >>> * device is ready.
> >>> @@ -1009,6 +1349,9 @@ static void rpmsg_remove(struct virtio_device
> >> *vdev)
> >>> struct virtproc_info *vrp = vdev->priv;
> >>> size_t total_buf_space = vrp->num_bufs * vrp->buf_size;
> >>> int ret;
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + struct virtio_rpmsg_rsvc *rsvc, *tmp; #endif
> >>>
> >>> vdev->config->reset(vdev);
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1021,6 +1364,13 @@ static void rpmsg_remove(struct virtio_device
> >>> *vdev)
> >>>
> >>> idr_destroy(&vrp->endpoints);
> >>>
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RPMSG_VIRTIO_CHAR
> >>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(rsvc, tmp, &vrp->rsvcs, node) {
> >>> + list_del(&rsvc->node);
> >>> + kfree(rsvc);
> >>> + }
> >>> +#endif
> >>> +
> >>> vdev->config->del_vqs(vrp->vdev);
> >>>
> >>> dma_free_coherent(vdev->dev.parent->parent, total_buf_space,
> >>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists