[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1F5F831F-0C4B-4DA9-8A48-D0D1C1ADC0D7@alien8.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:49:36 +0100
From: Boris Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
CC: "ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"keescook@...gle.com" <keescook@...gle.com>,
"gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>,
"Ghitulete, Razvan-alin" <rga@...zon.com>,
"dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"luto@...capital.net" <luto@...capital.net>,
"jikos@...nel.org" <jikos@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...ux-foundation.org" <gregkh@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/retpoline: Fill return stack buffer on vmexit
On January 11, 2018 9:42:38 AM GMT+01:00, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>Or we teach the alternative thing to patch in a jmp to end instead of
>NOP padding the entire thing as soon as the jmp (3 bytes) fits ?
Or, even better: use alternative_call() to call functions instead of patching gazillion bytes.
--
Sent from a small device: formatting sux and brevity is inevitable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists