[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <593cbb66-7040-b27d-5109-702fb43dc18e@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:33:27 +0100
From: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To: Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@...ogic.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM64: dts: meson-axg: add RMII pins for ethernet
controller
On 11/01/2018 10:11, Yixun Lan wrote:
> Hi Jeromeļ¼
>
> On 01/11/18 16:37, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 11:04 +0800, Yixun Lan wrote:
>>> Comparing to RGMII interface, the RMII interface require few pins.
>>> So it's worth describing them here.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@...ogic.com>
>>
>> The only axg platform we have upstream is the s400 and is using rgmii.
>> May I ask how this was tested ?
>>
> It's true that S400 using RGMII interface.
>
> but, we have customer using RTL8201FR-VB/VD which is a RMII PHY,
>
> This is actually tested with the 'eth_rmii_x_pins' group.
>
> Yixun
>
I pushed the same for GXBB,
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists