[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180111121744.5msbbjop4yvtn7ni@salvia>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 13:17:44 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Ahmed Abdelsalam <amsalam20@...il.com>
Cc: kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, fw@...len.de, davem@...emloft.net,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iptables] extensions: add support for 'srh' match
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:14:52AM +0100, Ahmed Abdelsalam wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:32:24 +0100
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:08:25PM +0100, Ahmed Abdelsalam wrote:
> > > This patch adds a new exetension to iptables to supprt 'srh' match
> > > The implementation considers revision 7 of the SRH draft.
> > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-07
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ahmed Abdelsalam <amsalam20@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > extensions/libip6t_srh.c | 283 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6t_srh.h | 63 +++++++
> >
> > Please, add a extensions/libip6t_srh.t test file and send a v2.
> >
> > Thanks.
> Ok,
> Is there minimum requirements of the test cases to be added to the extensions/libip6t_srh.t file ?
I leave it up to you to decide what level of coverage you consider is
good to make sure that future changes don't break your new feature.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists