linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/30] kexec_file: Restrict at runtime if the kernel is locked down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <13005.1515674877@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:47:57 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jforbes@...hat.com,
        Chun-Yi Lee <joeyli.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/30] kexec_file: Restrict at runtime if the kernel is locked down

David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:

> > I don't like the idea that the lockdown (which is a runtime
> > thing) requires a compile time option (KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG) that
> > forces the verification even when the kernel is then not locked
> > down at runtime.
> 
> It doesn't.  The EPERM only triggers if:
> 
>  (1) File signatures aren't mandatory (ie. CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG) is not
>      set, and
> 
>  (2) you're not using IMA appraisal to validate the file contents, and
> 
>  (3) lockdown mode is enabled.
> 
> If file signatures are mandatory or IMA appraisal is in use, then the lockdown
> state doesn't need to be checked.

Having said that, I do see your point, I think.  We should still let through
validly signed images, even if signatures aren't mandatory in lockdown mode.

David