linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI/ACPI: Disable AER when

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gU6var3gNQsp2GkSujbR=vB2Zj4dZHKNOzfAtC76jFbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:38:34 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
Cc:     ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/ACPI: Disable AER when _OSC control bit is clear.

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@....com> wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
>
> Currently, aer_service_init() checks if AER is available and that
> Firmware First handling is not enabled. The _OSC request for AER is
> not taken into account when deciding to enable AER in Linux.
>
> We should check that the _OSC control for AER is set. If it's not
> then AER should be disabled.
>
> The _OSC control for AER is not requested when APEI Firmware First is
> used, so the same condition applies.
>
> Mark AER as disabled if the _OSC request was not made or accepted.
>
> Remove redunant check for aer_acpi_firmware_first() when calling
> aer_service_init(), since this is check is already included when
> checking the _OSC control.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c       | 3 +++
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 6fc204a52493..19a625ed8de9 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -512,6 +512,9 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm)
>                  */
>                 *no_aspm = 1;
>         }
> +
> +       if (!(requested & control & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL))

One of the operators above needs to be a && I suppose?

> +               pci_no_aer();
>  }
>
>  static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c
> index 6ff5f5b4f5e6..39bb059777d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c
> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static void aer_error_resume(struct pci_dev *dev)
>   */
>  static int __init aer_service_init(void)
>  {
> -       if (!pci_aer_available() || aer_acpi_firmware_first())
> +       if (!pci_aer_available())
>                 return -ENXIO;
>         return pcie_port_service_register(&aerdriver);
>  }
> --