[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180111192601.cck3eq26vorybudk@treble>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 13:26:01 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] x86/entry/pti: don't switch PGD on when
pti_disable is set
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 08:19:35PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> Wouldn't the time taken by an easy syscall like getuid be a clear indicator?
I think only if you had a baseline measurement to compare against.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists