linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 18/19] btrfs: only dirty the inode in btrfs_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:30:32 -0800
From:   Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        bfields@...ldses.org, neilb@...e.de, jack@...e.de,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        darrick.wong@...cle.com, david@...morbit.com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, clm@...com, jbacik@...com,
        dsterba@...e.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
        jaltman@...istor.com, krzk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 18/19] btrfs: only dirty the inode in
 btrfs_update_time if something was changed

Hi Jeff,

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:10:58AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
> 
> At this point, we know that "now" and the file times may differ, and we
> suspect that the i_version has been flagged to be bumped. Attempt to
> bump the i_version, and only mark the inode dirty if that actually
> occurred or if one of the times was updated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index ac8692849a81..76245323a7c8 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -6107,19 +6107,20 @@ static int btrfs_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *now,
>  			     int flags)
>  {
>  	struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
> +	bool dirty = flags & ~S_VERSION;
>  
>  	if (btrfs_root_readonly(root))
>  		return -EROFS;
>  
>  	if (flags & S_VERSION)
> -		inode_inc_iversion(inode);
> +		dirty |= inode_maybe_inc_iversion(inode, dirty);
>  	if (flags & S_CTIME)
>  		inode->i_ctime = *now;
>  	if (flags & S_MTIME)
>  		inode->i_mtime = *now;
>  	if (flags & S_ATIME)
>  		inode->i_atime = *now;
> -	return btrfs_dirty_inode(inode);
> +	return dirty ? btrfs_dirty_inode(inode) : 0;
>  }
>  

In order to have a easier error handling for ENOSPC, btrfs has split
file_update_time() into 2-step work,
- step 1 is to update time/iversion of in-memory inode in
  update_time_for_write(),
- step 2 is to update the time/iversion of on-disk inode in
  btrfs_update_inode()->fill_inode_item().

I think update_time_for_write() also needs to be updated to use the
new iversion API.

With that,

Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@...cle.com>

Thanks,

-liubo
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.14.3
>