linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux dev-4.10 0/6] Add support PECI and PECI hwmon drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1515703795.31850.45.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jan 2018 07:49:55 +1100
From:   Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>,
        jdelvare@...e.com, arnd@...db.de, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        andrew@...id.au, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...el.com>, linux@...ck-us.net,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux dev-4.10 0/6] Add support PECI and PECI hwmon
 drivers

On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 10:59 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> And, if you use it in a device, it's still totally unsupported and
> insecure.  Seriously, does no one actually pay attention to the patches
> I merge in the stable trees anymore?

Yeah not sure why we aren't picking an LTC here, it could be that it's
just a dev branch, not release, Joel, what's the process in that case ?

For anything going into products, if we're going to maintain a non-
upstream branch, we should definitely stick it to an LTS release or
we'll be missing a ton of security fixes.

Cheers,
Ben.