| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180111232046.778b447f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 23:20:46 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
rostedt@...e.goodmis.org, Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] printk: Console owner and waiter logic cleanup
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 21:55:47 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> I ran this on a box with 4 CPUs and a serial console (so it has a slow
> console). Again, all I have is each CPU doing exactly ONE printk()!
> then sleeping for a full millisecond! It will cause a lot of output,
> and perhaps slow the system down. But it should not lock up the system.
> But without my patch, it does!
I decided to see how this works without a slow serial console. So I
rebooted the box and enabled hyper-threading (doubling the number of
CPUs to 8), and then ran this module, with serial disabled.
As expected, it did not lock up. That's because there was only a single
console (VGA) and it is fast enough to keep up. Especially, since I
have a 1 millisecond sleep between printks.
But I ran the function_graph tracer to see what was happening. Here's
the unpatched case. It didn't take long to see a single CPU suffering
(and this is with a fast console!)
kworker/1:2-309 [001] 78.677770: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 78.677772: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 78.677772: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 78.677778: funcgraph_exit: 4.528 us | }
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 78.677779: funcgraph_exit: 5.875 us | }
kworker/0:0-3 [000] 78.678745: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.678749: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/4:1-73 [004] 78.678751: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/0:0-3 [000] 78.678752: funcgraph_exit: 4.893 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.678754: funcgraph_exit: 4.287 us | }
kworker/4:1-73 [004] 78.678756: funcgraph_exit: 3.964 us | }
kworker/6:1-147 [006] 78.679751: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/2:3-1295 [002] 78.679753: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/6:1-147 [006] 78.679767: funcgraph_exit: + 13.735 us | }
kworker/2:3-1295 [002] 78.679768: funcgraph_exit: + 14.318 us | }
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 78.680751: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 78.680753: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 78.680756: funcgraph_exit: 3.981 us | }
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 78.680757: funcgraph_exit: 3.499 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.681734: funcgraph_entry: 3.388 us | printk();
kworker/4:1-73 [004] 78.681752: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/0:0-3 [000] 78.681753: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/4:1-73 [004] 78.681756: funcgraph_exit: 3.009 us | }
kworker/0:0-3 [000] 78.681757: funcgraph_exit: 3.708 us | }
kworker/2:3-1295 [002] 78.682742: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/6:1-147 [006] 78.682746: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/2:3-1295 [002] 78.682749: funcgraph_exit: 4.548 us | }
kworker/6:1-147 [006] 78.682750: funcgraph_exit: 3.001 us | }
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 78.683751: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 78.683753: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 78.683756: funcgraph_exit: 3.869 us | }
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 78.683757: funcgraph_exit: 4.300 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.684736: funcgraph_entry: 2.074 us | printk();
kworker/4:1-73 [004] 78.684755: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/0:0-3 [000] 78.684755: funcgraph_entry: 3.065 us | printk();
kworker/4:1-73 [004] 78.684760: funcgraph_exit: 4.091 us | }
kworker/6:1-147 [006] 78.685744: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/2:3-1295 [002] 78.685744: funcgraph_entry: 4.616 us | printk();
kworker/6:1-147 [006] 78.685752: funcgraph_exit: 5.943 us | }
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 78.686763: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 78.686767: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 78.686770: funcgraph_exit: 4.570 us | }
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 78.686771: funcgraph_exit: 3.262 us | }
kworker/1:2-309 [001] 78.687626: funcgraph_exit: # 9854.982 us | }
CPU 1 was stuck for 9 milliseconds doing nothing but handling printk.
And this is without a serial or slow console.
With a patched kernel:
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 85.937411: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 85.937416: funcgraph_exit: 3.357 us | }
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 85.937416: funcgraph_exit: 4.388 us | }
kworker/2:2-315 [002] 85.937793: funcgraph_exit: # 1391.842 us | }
kworker/1:2-592 [001] 85.938391: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/4:2-529 [004] 85.938396: funcgraph_entry: 3.267 us | printk();
kworker/6:1-150 [006] 85.938555: funcgraph_exit: # 1159.354 us | }
kworker/0:2-127 [000] 85.939393: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/5:2-352 [005] 85.939394: funcgraph_entry: + 13.403 us | printk();
kworker/1:2-592 [001] 85.939718: funcgraph_exit: # 1325.211 us | }
kworker/0:2-127 [000] 85.940345: funcgraph_exit: ! 951.361 us | }
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 85.940390: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 85.940390: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/2:2-315 [002] 85.940391: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 85.940396: funcgraph_exit: 4.144 us | }
kworker/2:2-315 [002] 85.940397: funcgraph_exit: 5.687 us | }
kworker/4:2-529 [004] 85.941403: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/6:1-150 [006] 85.941407: funcgraph_entry: 3.167 us | printk();
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 85.941545: funcgraph_exit: # 1153.899 us | }
kworker/4:2-529 [004] 85.942371: funcgraph_exit: ! 966.322 us | }
kworker/1:2-592 [001] 85.942411: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/5:2-352 [005] 85.942411: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/1:2-592 [001] 85.942416: funcgraph_exit: 4.099 us | }
kworker/0:2-127 [000] 85.942553: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/5:2-352 [005] 85.942739: funcgraph_exit: ! 326.853 us | }
kworker/0:2-127 [000] 85.943358: funcgraph_exit: ! 804.095 us | }
kworker/2:2-315 [002] 85.943388: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 85.943391: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/2:2-315 [002] 85.943754: funcgraph_exit: ! 364.921 us | }
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 85.944127: funcgraph_exit: ! 734.864 us | }
kworker/6:1-150 [006] 85.944408: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 85.944408: funcgraph_entry: 4.911 us | printk();
kworker/6:1-150 [006] 85.945235: funcgraph_exit: ! 826.596 us | }
kworker/0:2-127 [000] 85.945398: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/5:2-352 [005] 85.945399: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/4:2-529 [004] 85.945400: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/1:2-592 [001] 85.945412: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/5:2-352 [005] 85.945415: funcgraph_exit: + 14.537 us | }
kworker/4:2-529 [004] 85.945416: funcgraph_exit: 5.494 us | }
kworker/0:2-127 [000] 85.945736: funcgraph_exit: ! 337.000 us | }
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 85.946403: funcgraph_entry: | printk() {
kworker/2:2-315 [002] 85.946409: funcgraph_entry: 3.275 us | printk();
kworker/1:2-592 [001] 85.946546: funcgraph_exit: # 1133.155 us | }
The load is spread out much better. No one CPU is stuck too badly.
As the function_graph tracer annotates functions that take over a
millisecond with a '#', I can grep and see how many take that long, and
for how long.
$ trace-cmd report trace-printk-nopatch-8cpus.dat |grep '#'
kworker/4:1-73 [004] 78.658973: funcgraph_exit: # 1247.220 us | }
kworker/2:3-1295 [002] 78.662340: funcgraph_exit: # 2616.456 us | }
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 78.671727: funcgraph_exit: # 1996.234 us | }
kworker/4:1-73 [004] 78.676696: funcgraph_exit: # 2954.230 us | }
kworker/1:2-309 [001] 78.687626: funcgraph_exit: # 9854.982 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.692652: funcgraph_exit: # 4920.607 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.696737: funcgraph_exit: # 1983.090 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.701426: funcgraph_exit: # 1686.832 us | }
kworker/2:3-1295 [002] 78.710736: funcgraph_exit: # 6975.033 us | }
kworker/1:2-309 [001] 78.712455: funcgraph_exit: # 1711.895 us | }
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 78.721588: funcgraph_exit: # 7835.767 us | }
kworker/1:2-309 [001] 78.729626: funcgraph_exit: # 5879.358 us | }
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 78.744426: funcgraph_exit: # 12678.256 us | }
kworker/1:2-309 [001] 78.754549: funcgraph_exit: # 7816.182 us | }
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 78.758612: funcgraph_exit: # 1874.185 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.762615: funcgraph_exit: # 1878.463 us | }
kworker/2:3-1295 [002] 78.771593: funcgraph_exit: # 6849.619 us | }
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 78.776616: funcgraph_exit: # 2868.446 us | }
kworker/1:2-309 [001] 78.780585: funcgraph_exit: # 2843.085 us | }
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 78.785701: funcgraph_exit: # 3949.963 us | }
kworker/1:2-309 [001] 78.787192: funcgraph_exit: # 1452.146 us | }
kworker/2:3-1295 [002] 78.791554: funcgraph_exit: # 2821.999 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.793686: funcgraph_exit: # 1934.499 us | }
kworker/2:3-1295 [002] 78.795377: funcgraph_exit: # 1641.652 us | }
kworker/6:1-147 [006] 78.815413: funcgraph_exit: # 2669.295 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.821529: funcgraph_exit: # 1782.758 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.826732: funcgraph_exit: # 2993.772 us | }
kworker/6:1-147 [006] 78.829676: funcgraph_exit: # 1920.164 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.831464: funcgraph_exit: # 1728.834 us | }
kworker/1:2-309 [001] 78.833674: funcgraph_exit: # 1939.356 us | }
kworker/1:2-309 [001] 78.839663: funcgraph_exit: # 3908.825 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.841376: funcgraph_exit: # 1624.089 us | }
kworker/1:2-309 [001] 78.843474: funcgraph_exit: # 1725.975 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.845490: funcgraph_exit: # 1753.258 us | }
kworker/5:1-78 [005] 78.850592: funcgraph_exit: # 2839.801 us | }
kworker/2:3-1295 [002] 78.855668: funcgraph_exit: # 3925.402 us | }
kworker/6:1-147 [006] 78.866346: funcgraph_exit: # 10603.155 us | }
CPUs can be stuck for over 10 milliseconds doing just printk!
With my patch:
kworker/0:2-127 [000] 85.902486: funcgraph_exit: # 1092.105 us | }
kworker/2:2-315 [002] 85.904458: funcgraph_exit: # 1070.174 us | }
kworker/4:2-529 [004] 85.907523: funcgraph_exit: # 1131.189 us | }
kworker/6:1-150 [006] 85.909187: funcgraph_exit: # 1802.074 us | }
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 85.910534: funcgraph_exit: # 1138.249 us | }
kworker/1:2-592 [001] 85.911586: funcgraph_exit: # 1207.807 us | }
kworker/2:2-315 [002] 85.914585: funcgraph_exit: # 1183.669 us | }
kworker/6:1-150 [006] 85.915426: funcgraph_exit: # 1019.587 us | }
kworker/5:2-352 [005] 85.916516: funcgraph_exit: # 1120.144 us | }
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 85.922472: funcgraph_exit: # 1071.437 us | }
kworker/4:2-529 [004] 85.923685: funcgraph_exit: # 1296.953 us | }
kworker/1:2-592 [001] 85.924481: funcgraph_exit: # 1051.758 us | }
kworker/5:2-352 [005] 85.926536: funcgraph_exit: # 1126.423 us | }
kworker/2:2-315 [002] 85.927403: funcgraph_exit: # 1020.366 us | }
kworker/1:2-592 [001] 85.928493: funcgraph_exit: # 1094.864 us | }
kworker/6:1-150 [006] 85.931457: funcgraph_exit: # 1052.531 us | }
kworker/1:2-592 [001] 85.932779: funcgraph_exit: # 1371.806 us | }
kworker/5:2-352 [005] 85.933536: funcgraph_exit: # 1128.199 us | }
kworker/2:2-315 [002] 85.937793: funcgraph_exit: # 1391.842 us | }
kworker/6:1-150 [006] 85.938555: funcgraph_exit: # 1159.354 us | }
kworker/1:2-592 [001] 85.939718: funcgraph_exit: # 1325.211 us | }
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 85.941545: funcgraph_exit: # 1153.899 us | }
kworker/1:2-592 [001] 85.946546: funcgraph_exit: # 1133.155 us | }
kworker/7:1-176 [007] 85.947730: funcgraph_exit: # 1325.744 us | }
kworker/3:1-72 [003] 85.948588: funcgraph_exit: # 1192.876 us | }
kworker/4:2-529 [004] 85.950647: funcgraph_exit: # 2248.783 us | }
kworker/6:1-150 [006] 85.951463: funcgraph_exit: # 1045.498 us | }
kworker/0:2-127 [000] 85.952576: funcgraph_exit: # 1171.645 us | }
kworker/1:2-592 [001] 85.953393: funcgraph_exit: # 1001.659 us | }
kworker/5:2-352 [005] 85.955542: funcgraph_exit: # 1130.396 us | }
It spreads the load out much nicer, and seldom goes over 2 milliseconds.
My trace was only for a few seconds (no events lost), and I can see the
max with:
$ trace-cmd report trace-printk-nopatch-8cpus.dat | grep '#' | cut -d'#' -f1 | sort -n | tail -20
13510.063 us | }
13531.914 us | }
13533.591 us | }
13574.488 us | }
13584.322 us | }
13611.234 us | }
13668.255 us | }
13710.294 us | }
13722.017 us | }
13725.000 us | }
13728.883 us | }
13740.601 us | }
13744.194 us | }
13770.512 us | }
13776.246 us | }
13809.729 us | }
13812.279 us | }
13830.563 us | }
13907.382 us | }
14498.937 us | }
We had a printk take up to 14 millisecond with a VGA console on 8 CPUs,
where each CPU was doing a single printk once per millisecond.
With my patch:
$ trace-cmd report trace-printk-patch-8cpus.dat |grep '#' | cut -d'#' -f 2 |sort -n | tail -20
2477.627 us | }
2482.012 us | }
2482.077 us | }
2488.672 us | }
2490.253 us | }
2502.381 us | }
2503.990 us | }
2505.448 us | }
2509.389 us | }
2510.868 us | }
2511.597 us | }
2512.108 us | }
2538.886 us | }
3095.917 us | }
3137.604 us | }
3223.213 us | }
3324.967 us | }
3331.018 us | }
3331.518 us | }
3348.263 us | }
We got up to just over 3 milliseconds for a single printk.
I think that's a damn good improvement.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists