| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVxrzP06Ps7qUNGbsV2PSdax4xhQdTj3y0-m_yhonDMHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:26:56 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PM / runtime: Rework pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume()
Hi Rafael,
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 5:03:18 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>> >>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> One of the limitations of pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() is that
>> >>>> if a parent driver wants to use these functions, all of its child
>> >>>> drivers have to do that too because of the parent usage counter
>> >>>> manipulations necessary to get the correct state of the parent during
>> >>>> system-wide transitions to the working state (system resume).
>> >>>> However, that limitation turns out to be artificial, so remove it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Namely, pm_runtime_force_suspend() only needs to update the children
>> >>>> counter of its parent (if there's is a parent) when the device can
>> >>>> stay in suspend after the subsequent system resume transition, as
>> >>>> that counter is correct already otherwise. Now, if the parent's
>> >>>> children counter is not updated, it is not necessary to increment
>> >>>> the parent's usage counter in that case any more, as long as the
>> >>>> children counters of devices are checked along with their usage
>> >>>> counters in order to decide whether or not the devices may be left
>> >>>> in suspend after the subsequent system resume transition.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Accordingly, modify pm_runtime_force_suspend() to only call
>> >>>> pm_runtime_set_suspended() for devices whose usage and children
>> >>>> counters are at the "no references" level (the runtime PM status
>> >>>> of the device needs to be updated to "suspended" anyway in case
>> >>>> this function is called once again for the same device during the
>> >>>> transition under way), drop the parent usage counter incrementation
>> >>>> from it and update pm_runtime_force_resume() to compensate for these
>> >>>> changes.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> This patch causes a regression during system resume on Renesas Salvator-XS
>> >>> with R-Car H3 ES2.0:
>> >>
>> >> I have dropped it for now, but we need to address the underlying issue.
>> >>
>> >>> SError Interrupt on CPU3, code 0xbf000002 -- SError
>> >>> SError Interrupt on CPU2, code 0xbf000002 -- SError
>> >>> CPU: 3 PID: 1769 Comm: kworker/u16:13 Not tainted
>> >>> 4.15.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05338-gf14cf570a813c9ca-dirty #97
>> >>> CPU: 2 PID: 1774 Comm: kworker/u16:18 Not tainted
>> >>> 4.15.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05338-gf14cf570a813c9ca-dirty #97
>> >>> Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on
>> >>> r8a7795 ES2.0+ (DT)
>> >>> Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on
>> >>> r8a7795 ES2.0+ (DT)
>> >>> Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
>> >>> Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
>> >>> pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
>> >>> pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
>> >>> pc : rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_init+0x34/0xf8
>> >>> pc : rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_init+0x34/0xf8
>> >>> lr : phy_init+0x64/0xcc
>> >>> lr : phy_init+0x64/0xcc
>> >>> ...
>> >>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt
>> >>>
>> >>> Note that before, it printed a warning instead:
>> >>>
>> >>> Enabling runtime PM for inactive device (ee0a0200.usb-phy) with
>> >>> active children
>> >>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1741 at drivers/base/power/runtime.c:1300
>> >>> pm_runtime_enable+0x94/0xd8
>> >>>
>> >>> Reverting commit 0408584d580d4a2c ("PM / runtime: Rework
>> >>> pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume()") fixes the crash.
>> >>>
>> >>> Note that applying Ulf's "[PATCH v2 0/3] phy: core: Re-work runtime PM
>> >>> deployment and fix an issue"
>> >>> (https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-renesas-soc/msg21719.html) instead
>> >>> does not fix the crash.
>> >>
>> >> OK
>> >>
>> >>> With more debug code added, it seems the EHCI module clocks (701-703) are
>> >>> enabled earlier than before. I guess this triggers the workqueue to perform
>> >>> an operation while another related device (HSUSB 704?) is still disabled?
>> >>
>> >> Probably.
>> >>
>> >> Likely a device that wasn't resumed before resumes now and that causes
>> >> the issue to appear.
>> >>
>> >> I'm wondering if adding the ignore_children check to the patch helps.
>> >> If not, there clearly is a resume ordering issue that is papered over
>> >> by the current code.
>> >
>> > Something fishy is going on. Status of the USB PHYs differ before/after
>> > system suspend, according to /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary:
>> >
>> > - /devices/platform/soc/ee0a0200.usb-phy active
>> > - /devices/platform/soc/ee0c0200.usb-phy active
>> > - /devices/platform/soc/ee080200.usb-phy active
>> > + /devices/platform/soc/ee0a0200.usb-phy suspended
>> > + /devices/platform/soc/ee0c0200.usb-phy suspended
>> > + /devices/platform/soc/ee080200.usb-phy suspended
>>
>> Yeah.
>>
>> That's because of the pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() called by
>> genpd. These functions generally may cause devices active before
>> system suspend to be left in suspend after it. That generally is a
>> good idea if the device was not really in use before the system
>> suspend, but there is a problem that the driver of it may not be
>> prepared for that to happen (and also the way to determine the "not
>> really in use" case may not be as expected by the driver).
>
> So below is something to try (untested).
>
> I know that Ulf will be protesting, but that's what I would do unless there
> are really *really* good reasons not to.
With the below, the issue is gone, both with and without the
dev->power.ignore_children check.
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -1048,8 +1048,9 @@ static int genpd_finish_suspend(struct d
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start) {
> - ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
> + if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start &&
> + !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
> + ret = genpd_stop_dev(genpd, dev);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1101,8 +1102,12 @@ static int genpd_resume_noirq(struct dev
> genpd->suspended_count--;
> genpd_unlock(genpd);
>
> - if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start)
> - ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
> + if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start &&
> + !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
> + ret = genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> ret = pm_generic_resume_noirq(dev);
> if (ret)
> @@ -1123,7 +1128,7 @@ static int genpd_resume_noirq(struct dev
> static int genpd_freeze_noirq(struct device *dev)
> {
> const struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
>
> @@ -1135,8 +1140,9 @@ static int genpd_freeze_noirq(struct dev
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start)
> - ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
> + if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start &&
> + !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev))
> + ret = genpd_stop_dev(genpd, dev);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1151,7 +1157,7 @@ static int genpd_freeze_noirq(struct dev
> static int genpd_thaw_noirq(struct device *dev)
> {
> const struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
>
> @@ -1159,8 +1165,9 @@ static int genpd_thaw_noirq(struct devic
> if (IS_ERR(genpd))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start) {
> - ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
> + if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start &&
> + !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
> + ret = genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1193,7 +1200,7 @@ static int genpd_poweroff_noirq(struct d
> static int genpd_restore_noirq(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
>
> @@ -1217,8 +1224,9 @@ static int genpd_restore_noirq(struct de
> genpd_sync_power_on(genpd, true, 0);
> genpd_unlock(genpd);
>
> - if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start) {
> - ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
> + if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start &&
> + !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
> + ret = genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists