lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc470686-374e-0c71-d797-62cffd76bb82@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:39:30 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, arm@...nel.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: brcmstb: Only register SoC device on STB platforms



On 09/01/18 14:54, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> 
> After moving the SoC device initialization to an early initcall in
> commit f780429adfbc ("soc: brcmstb: biuctrl: Move to early_initcall"),
> the Broadcom STB SoC device is registered on all platforms if support
> for the device is enabled in the kernel configuration.
> 
> This causes an additional SoC device to appear on platforms that already
> register a native one. In case of Tegra the STB SoC device is registered
> as soc0 (with totally meaningless content in the sysfs attributes) and
> causes various scripts and programs to fail because they don't know how
> to parse that data.
> 
> To fix this, duplicate the check from brcmstb_soc_device_early_init()
> that already prevents the code from doing anything nonsensical on non-
> STB platforms.
> 
> Fixes: f780429adfbc ("soc: brcmstb: biuctrl: Move to early_initcall")
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/common.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/common.c b/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/common.c
> index 781ada62d0a3..4fe1cb73b39a 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/common.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/common.c
> @@ -89,8 +89,13 @@ early_initcall(brcmstb_soc_device_early_init);
>  static int __init brcmstb_soc_device_init(void)
>  {
>  	struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> +	struct device_node *sun_top_ctrl;
>  	struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>  
> +	sun_top_ctrl = of_find_matching_node(NULL, sun_top_ctrl_match);
> +	if (!sun_top_ctrl)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +

missing of_node_put(sun_top_ctrl) ? or am I missing to see that elsewhere ?

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ