[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4928977.5hd79RbQlp@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 14:00:00 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] PM / core: genpd fix and pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume() rework
Hi,
This comes from the recent discussion/testing effort that ensued after my
pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume() changes proposal:
https://marc.info/?t=151497772000004&r=1&w=2
Patch [1/2] basically is https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10152873/ rebased
on top of the current linux-next branch of the linux-pm.git tree (the relevant
part should be there in the linux-next tree proper ATM). It applies on top
of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10156077/ which should apply to the Linus'
tree cleanly.
Patch [2/2] is a resend of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10142047/ with
a very minor changelog modification and the R-b tag from Ulf.
Geert, if possible, please test this on the Renesas systems that had the
problem with https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10142047/ previously and let
me know if you still see issues.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists