[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180112131623.GA29734@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 14:16:23 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: PM regression in next
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 02:01:14PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 01/12/2018 01:30 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, January 12, 2018 1:23:54 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Friday, January 12, 2018 2:32:57 AM CET Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>> * Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> [180111 17:20]:
> >>>> Well I tried to measure suspend power consumption and noticed
> >>>> that system suspend fails too hand hangs the network device:
> >>>>
> >>>> # echo mem > /sys/power/state
> >>>> [ 32.577850] PM: suspend entry (deep)
> >>>> [ 32.582031] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
> >>>> [ 32.598083] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.002 seconds) done.
> >>>> [ 32.608398] OOM killer disabled.
> >>>> [ 32.611846] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.002 seconds) done.
> >>>> [ 32.622192] Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
> >>>> [ 32.651123] dpm_run_callback(): mdio_bus_suspend+0x0/0x24 returns 4352
> >>>> [ 32.651428] PM: Device 2c000000.ethernet-ffffffff:01 failed to suspend: error 4352
> >>
> >> This looks totally bogus.
> >>
> >> First, "error" should be a negative number and we print it as int.
> >>
> >> Second, error codes are not in this range anyway.
> >>
> >>>> [ 32.653289] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event detected
> >>>> [ 32.685455] OOM killer enabled.
> >>>> [ 32.688629] Restarting tasks ... done.
> >>>> [ 32.695983] PM: suspend exit
> >>>> ash: write error: Bad address
> >>>>
> >>>> That too works just fine at commit 70286688e5ad.
> >>>
> >>> Suspend fails at commit e2d7fe89e8ae though, so looks like we
> >>> have two separate issues. I'll try to bisect that separately.
> >
> > I guess what may happen is that something started to return positive numbers
> > which confuse things all over when passed along by its callers as error codes.
>
>
> I guess it this: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10151763/
Hi Tony,
Please try:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/859297/
Hopefully we will get this into net-next soon.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists