linux-kernel - Re: PM regression in next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 Jan 2018 14:55:26 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: PM regression in next

> Thanks that fixes the suspend error. And I was able to confirm
> that the suspend power consumption is OK.
> 
> That still leaves the mystery of the runtime idle power consumption
> being much higher with commit e130bc1d00a4.

Did you re-measure the runtime power? Do you have an unused PHY? It
could be it is not getting shut down. 1G PHYs can be quite power
hungry.

	Andrew