linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / core: genpd fix and pm_runtime_force

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdX6dJzOcxkWyDR6anpcwZU5fy03sTeChEp35KY0d40iFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:31:09 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / core: genpd fix and pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume()
 rework

Hi Rafael,

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> This comes from the recent discussion/testing effort that ensued after my
> pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume() changes proposal:
>
> https://marc.info/?t=151497772000004&r=1&w=2
>
> Patch [1/2] basically is https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10152873/ rebased
> on top of the current linux-next branch of the linux-pm.git tree (the relevant
> part should be there in the linux-next tree proper ATM).  It applies on top
> of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10156077/ which should apply to the Linus'
> tree cleanly.
>
> Patch [2/2] is a resend of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10142047/ with
> a very minor changelog modification and the R-b tag from Ulf.
>
> Geert, if possible, please test this on the Renesas systems that had the
> problem with https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10142047/ previously and let
> me know if you still see issues.

I've tested this on two very similar systems: Salvator-XS with R-Car H3 ES2.0,
and Salvator-X with R-Car M3-W ES1.0.

On the M3-based system, everything seems to work fine.
On the H3-based system, the serial console (the /dev/ttySC0 device, not kernel
serial output) is dead after resume from s2ram, with and without
no_console_suspend.

With no_console_suspend, I see:

    ttySC ttySC0: 1 input overrun(s)

after typing on the serial console, so it looks like an interrupt problem.

This issue seems to be caused by patch [1/2]. But I have no idea what's
really happening, and why the two systems behave differently.

Oh well, have a nice weekend!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds