[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180112145237.GA32050@bfoster.bfoster>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 09:52:38 -0500
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
To: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...com>
Cc: darrick.wong@...cle.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: destroy mutex pag_ici_reclaim_lock before free
xfs_perag_t structure
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 08:11:51PM +0800, Xiongwei Song wrote:
> The mutex pag_ici_reclaim_lock of xfs_perag_t structure is initialized in
> xfs_initialize_perag. If happen errors in xfs_initialize_perag, or free
> resources in xfs_free_perag, wo need to destroy the mutex before free
> perag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...com>
> ---
Only relevant with mutex debugging enabled I suppose, but seems
appropriate:
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> index c879b517cc94..98fd41cbb9e1 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ xfs_free_perag(
> ASSERT(pag);
> ASSERT(atomic_read(&pag->pag_ref) == 0);
> xfs_buf_hash_destroy(pag);
> + mutex_destroy(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock);
> call_rcu(&pag->rcu_head, __xfs_free_perag);
> }
> }
> @@ -248,6 +249,7 @@ xfs_initialize_perag(
> out_hash_destroy:
> xfs_buf_hash_destroy(pag);
> out_free_pag:
> + mutex_destroy(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock);
> kmem_free(pag);
> out_unwind_new_pags:
> /* unwind any prior newly initialized pags */
> @@ -256,6 +258,7 @@ xfs_initialize_perag(
> if (!pag)
> break;
> xfs_buf_hash_destroy(pag);
> + mutex_destroy(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock);
> kmem_free(pag);
> }
> return error;
> --
> 2.15.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists