[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1515777968-867-24-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 18:26:07 +0100
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kirill@...temov.name,
ak@...ux.intel.com, mhocko@...nel.org, dave@...olabs.net,
jack@...e.cz, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, paulus@...ba.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, hpa@...or.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
kemi.wang@...el.com, sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
haren@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
npiggin@...il.com, bsingharora@...il.com,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 23/24] x86/mm: Add speculative pagefault handling
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Try a speculative fault before acquiring mmap_sem, if it returns with
VM_FAULT_RETRY continue with the mmap_sem acquisition and do the
traditional fault.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
[Clearing of FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY is now done in
handle_speculative_fault()]
[Retry with usual fault path in the case VM_ERROR is returned by
handle_speculative_fault(). This allows signal to be delivered]
[Don't build SPF call if !CONFIG_SPF]
[Try speculative fault path only for multi threaded processes]
[Try to the VMA fetch during the speculative path in case of retry]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 06fe3d51d385..8db69a116521 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -1242,6 +1242,9 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
unsigned long address)
{
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+ struct vm_area_struct *spf_vma = NULL;
+#endif
struct task_struct *tsk;
struct mm_struct *mm;
int fault, major = 0;
@@ -1339,6 +1342,27 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
if (error_code & X86_PF_INSTR)
flags |= FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+ if ((error_code & X86_PF_USER) && (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) > 1)) {
+ fault = handle_speculative_fault(mm, address, flags,
+ &spf_vma);
+
+ if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY)) {
+ if (!(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR)) {
+ perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF, 1,
+ regs, address);
+ goto done;
+ }
+ /*
+ * In case of error we need the pkey value, but
+ * can't get it from the spf_vma as it is only returned
+ * when VM_FAULT_RETRY is returned. So we have to
+ * retry the page fault with the mmap_sem grabbed.
+ */
+ }
+ }
+#endif /* CONFIG_SPF */
+
/*
* When running in the kernel we expect faults to occur only to
* addresses in user space. All other faults represent errors in
@@ -1372,7 +1396,16 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
might_sleep();
}
- vma = find_vma(mm, address);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+ if (spf_vma) {
+ if (can_reuse_spf_vma(spf_vma, address))
+ vma = spf_vma;
+ else
+ vma = find_vma(mm, address);
+ spf_vma = NULL;
+ } else
+#endif
+ vma = find_vma(mm, address);
if (unlikely(!vma)) {
bad_area(regs, error_code, address);
return;
@@ -1458,6 +1491,9 @@ __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
return;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPF
+done:
+#endif
/*
* Major/minor page fault accounting. If any of the events
* returned VM_FAULT_MAJOR, we account it as a major fault.
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists