[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1515792119.131759.52.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:21:59 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
Cc: tariqt@...lanox.com, junxiao.bi@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_en: ensure rx_desc updating reaches HW before
prod db updating
On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 13:01 -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> which is better to grasp ?:
>
> update_doorbell() {
> dma_wmb();
> ring->db = prod;
> }
This one is IMO the most secure one (least surprise)
Considering the time it took to discover this bug, I would really play
safe.
But obviously I do not maintain mlx4.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists